|
Re: More than 1 Sendablechooser
Quote:
Originally Posted by christheman200
Sendable choosers are great, but I would caution teams against using them. At GTRC we were rarely able to establish coms through the smart dashboard, and many other teams were having this problem as well. Smart dashboard is not a very reliable option, so I would warn against using it to select your auto. We ended up changing our selected auto through a code re-upload before every match, although we'll be using a set of physical switches on the robot in the future.
|
What programming language do you use?
We had big issues with SmartDashboard last year when we were using LabVIEW.
We switched to Java this year and have had no issues with SmartDashboard or SendableChoosers (we use 6) through 2 competitions.
__________________
2016: Greater Kansas City Regional Finalists, Oklahoma Regional Winners, Tesla Semifinalists, IRI Quarterfinalists
2015: Greater Kansas City Regional Finalists, Oklahoma Regional Winners, Tesla Quarterfinalists, IRI Winners
2014: Central Illinois Regional Quarterfinalists, Greater Kansas City Regional Finalists, Newton Semifinalists
2013: Greater Kansas City Regional Winners, Oklahoma Regional Winners, Galileo Quarterfinalists
|
We all know that with mechanical systems, once all the noise has leaked out, the system quits (therefore quiet running mechanical systems last much longer :^) - KenWittlief [more] 
27-03-2016, 14:55
Threaded Mode