|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
For that to happen someone has to sandbag hard and the rest of the regional has to have completely incompetent scouting.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
Well one of those is inevitably going to be true... bad scouting is almost assured.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
You seem to have beat me to the spreadsheets this year. 👀
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
The spreadsheets that I put out have an editable link and they could use a lot of work
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
I have populated both of the database sheets with data from Iowa and Wisconsin. I will be publishing week 4 updates to the 4536 database in a day or two which will corroborate the values I have copied in.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
Quote:
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
I think this alliance would have a very realistic chance of setting the world high score, even in quals.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minneapolis Regional Discussion 2016
They would probably score 252 points.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|