Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari423
Right now a z test of the data yields a p-value of .273 (i.e. very not statistically significant). That means there is a 27.3% chance that this is just random chance causing the gap, not an actual correlation. Until we get more data or the gap grows substantially, we can't conclude that there is any correlation rather than just random chance. Statistics ftw.
|
What "gap" are you referring to, and to whom are you responding?
There's no quoted context for your post, and it's linked to
post #5
Has anybody seen our programmer? He was last sighted walking southbound in the rain, his laptop tucked under his arm, grumbling to himself. - Taylor [more] 
30-03-2016, 13:27
Threaded Mode