|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
This depends on your definition of "deep". There's great teams for sure, but once you get to the second round the firepower goes waayyyyy down. Typically that doesn't happen as much in "deep" events
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
The firepower goes down in some championship sub divisions as well. His point was the amount of elite/upper tier bots at this regional are high and compared to some championship divisions, waterloo may have more elite/upper tier bots I think. Obviously you can't compare a regional with 30 robots and a championship division with 75 robots fairly, there will be differences such as what you mentioned with 2nd picks.
Last edited by jajabinx124 : 04-01-2016 at 09:15 PM. |
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Anyone know if matches are already archived anywhere?
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Not yet.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
The other thing is that there are teams in that second tier of teams, like 865, that would be a high seed and have a very good shot of putting together a competitive alliance at a lot of weaker events with less elite machines.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
This has been a very peculiar Semifinals.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Agreed. The last couple seconds of SF 2-1 were kind of horrifying though.
Those alliances were insanely well-balanced though. 2-2 should be extremely fun to watch. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
What is going on? The semis seem very exciting. Can someone explain why the top 2 alliances have struggled so far in semis?
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Quote:
In SF2-1, 5032 punted 148 off the bar, basically costing them the match. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Costing them the match seems a little misleading -- if 5032 had made it onto the batter without knocking down 148 and securing the capture, their score would have been 45 points higher, whereas the game margin was 50 -- but certainly devastating nonetheless.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Aaaaaand now the comebacks, as alliances 1 & 2 win their respective semi-2 matches. Down to the wire in both of them, 2.
WATER WATER WATER! Edit: Oh God, Karthik is kicking the walls again... Last edited by M217 : 04-02-2016 at 04:35 PM. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Oh boy.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Waterloo Regional 2016
Anyone know why 1114 keeps losing coms?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|