|
|
|
 Ok, so you are going to use a robot to hold all of those rivets together? - gblake [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Ok, so you are going to use a robot to hold all of those rivets together? - gblake [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#78
02-04-2016, 19:41
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
5736 was #1 seed at SBPLI and low bar capable.
|
|
#79
02-04-2016, 19:48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
We (1684) were not low bar capable (cool kids club) at Lansing (though we were designed with the ability to rip off our upper structure if our alliance has no low bar robot). 33 at Troy was low bar capable.
|
|
#80
02-04-2016, 20:00
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
Code Orange 3476 is not low bar capable and just won the Orange County Regional (with 3309 and 6220) as a 1st seed.
Last edited by AustinNordman : 02-04-2016 at 20:02.
|
|
#81
03-04-2016, 02:48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
#1 seed 1540 Flaming Chickens was low bar capable but #2 seed and first pick 2471 Team Mean Machine was not at Oregon City
|
|
#83
03-04-2016, 14:23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
1257 seeded first at Bridgewater-Raritan and is low bar capable, as is our first pick, 25.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
