|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Westtown MAR District Won on Eliminations Tiebreaker Rules
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Westtown MAR District Won on Eliminations Tiebreaker Rules
Cue debate regarding whether or not soccer counts as a "major sport."
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Westtown MAR District Won on Eliminations Tiebreaker Rules
In light of recent events, I'd thought I'd give this thread a bump.
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Westtown MAR District Won on Eliminations Tiebreaker Rules
Quote:
Quote:
So was it ever actually explained to the audience? I quickly realized that the win was decided on foul points, but I was waiting for an announcement to be made to the audience and I don't remember there ever being one. Then again, the audio was so bad where I was sitting that there easily could have been one without me hearing. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Westtown MAR District Won on Eliminations Tiebreaker Rules
I think there was an explanation, as I recall--but at that point, I'd already figured out what was going on.
As in, I'd seen the tied score on the screen, seen that both alliances had one scale and a Capture, and I'd seen the flag fly for pinning. I knew that if the score held, 330's alliance would win. It might make more sense if they applied the rule to give one point to whoever had the tiebreaker. Last edited by EricH : 01-05-2016 at 09:25. Reason: clarity |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|