Silicon Valley Regional (2016)

[Citrus Dad]

Originally Posted by Michael Corsetto

I think both alliances handled the situation very well, as uncomfortable as it was. However, there was quite a bit of boo-ing from the audience after the scoring change. I think this has become one of the unfortunate cultures at SVR, and it isn't the first time that 254 has been boo-ed at this event.

-Mike

Unfortunately, I think this was exacerbated by a failure to explain the reason for the change in score. It is very important to give a full explanation for such a change, especially when it arises from a rules interpretation. Most of the audience is not familiar with the nuances of the rules and its appropriate to give them a good explanation. We were able to piece most of it together in the stands, but that may not have been true for others.

[Citrus Dad]

My best experiences from SVR: Talking with other teams about how their programs can get and are getting better. Sharing resources is key to the success of FRC. I was particularly thrilled to hear about the change at 841 with greater support from their school and new sponsorships. This might even open an avenue for a new key FIRST sponsor. Please come and visit at Champs if you're there.

[bduddy]

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad

Unfortunately, I think this was exacerbated by a failure to explain the reason for the change in score. It is very important to give a full explanation for such a change, especially when it arises from a rules interpretation. Most of the audience is not familiar with the nuances of the rules and its appropriate to give them a good explanation. We were able to piece most of it together in the stands, but that may not have been true for others.

I completely agree, which is why I told the game announcer that he really should give more of an explanation. I think it's telling that the reaction to the explanation was a lot less negative.

And I apologize for any confusion caused by me mis-remembering the situation in F1 and posting as such.