[FiM] Michigan State Championship Preview

[Christopher149]

HOT, Rush, and Fighting Pi (27, 67, 1718) just got a new world high score of 230 in a SF tie breaker match.

Edit: Apparently the score is higher and TBA hasn't updated yet. Well, 230 is the high score for MSC, at least.

[Arhowk]

Originally Posted by Christopher149

HOT, Rush, and Fighting Pi (27, 67, 1718) just got a new world high score of 230 in a SF tie breaker match.

The current high score is above 250

Also, I told you my sophomore boys were going farther than quarters...

100% accuracy today

[Christopher149]

Originally Posted by Arhowk

The current high score is above 250

Also, I told you my sophomore boys were going farther than quarters...

100% accuracy today

Oops... TBA hasn't updated. Edited post to reflect this.

Edit: And did the stream go offline for everyone?

[Doug Frisk]

Originally Posted by Christopher149

Oops... TBA hasn't updated. Edited post to reflect this.

Edit: And did the stream go offline for everyone?

It's dead for me.

[Bob Steele]

Same here... dead going into finals

[FIMAlumni]

Very Choppy stream, but robozone is still up http://www.robozonetv.com/live-stream

Edit: Stream is back up, but robozone is a good backup if it goes down again.

[Doug Frisk]

Interesting recall on that first finals match. As it was described it should have been a field fault. If the ref panel failed that's a field fault.

[TheOwlOfTruth]

Congrats to 27, 67, 1718, and 6086 on a hard-fought win! This entire event has been crazy competitive, kudos to them for a good win.

[Basel A]

Easily the best MSC finals since 2010 (maybe ever). Congrats to the champions! Incredible matches in every round

[Arhowk]

Dang.

We accidentally shot when we were about to climb and it messed up the extension of the arm.

Funny that both the team that I'm on and the team that I mentor got knocked out due to failed climbs.

Oh well, 5460 the silver kings (0-4). Congratulations to 27, 67, and 1718

[Josh Fox]

Originally Posted by DareDad

Interesting recall on that first finals match. As it was described it should have been a field fault. If the ref panel failed that's a field fault.

As I understood it, it wasn't a failure of the tablet, but a failure of FMS to register what the tablet said. I'm no expert on the system, but is that not similar to when real-time scoring fails? They don't call field faults for those.

[Carl C]

Originally Posted by Josh Fox

...is that not similar to when real-time scoring fails? They don't call field faults for those.

They did in NE this weekend. I am not entirely sure, but I think whether to redo the match or not in that case is up to the head referee's discretion.

[Doug Frisk]

Originally Posted by Carl C

They did in NE this weekend. I am not entirely sure, but I think whether to redo the match or not in that case is up to the head referee's discretion.

They also called a field fault in MI earlier today when one of the automated scorers failed.

[Carl C]

Originally Posted by DareDad

They also called a field fault in MI earlier today when one of the automated scorers failed.

Maybe there is a difference between the automatic scorers and the human-operated scorers.

[ATannahill]

Wow, the fight for the last district point spot went down to the 6th tie-breaker and was awarded to the 76th ranked team.