|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
![]() The lines show the percent of half-matches with a certain score that damaged the tower to a certain degree. This leads me to believe that increasing tower strength may be a fairly big deal in qualifications (where match scores should hang around in the 100-150 range), but no so much in eliminations, where teams should be able to put up 120+ without the breach/capture bonuses. Last edited by wjordan : 19-04-2016 at 22:32. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
Quote:
Code:
New Rank, Team, New Rank Pts, Spots Changed 1 frc2767 44 0 2 frc3620 42 7 3 frc4967 42 3 4 frc2771 41 7 5 frc4003 41 -2 6 frc5150 41 -2 7 frc33 41 3 8 frc27 39 -6 9 frc494 38 5 10 frc1023 38 7 11 frc5980 38 -6 12 frc1918 37 -4 13 frc67 37 0 14 frc6086 37 17 15 frc5050 37 0 16 frc573 37 8 17 frc3641 37 -1 18 frc70 36 -11 19 frc5053 36 0 20 frc858 35 9 21 frc3688 34 1 22 frc5505 34 1 23 frc2474 34 -11 24 frc4391 33 -3 25 frc548 33 13 26 frc107 33 19 27 frc1701 33 6 28 frc5048 33 -3 29 frc5712 33 19 30 frc3534 33 -10 31 frc3548 33 31 32 frc2834 32 -2 33 frc3098 32 6 34 frc51 32 8 35 frc4362 32 -17 36 frc3604 32 -8 37 frc1481 32 22 38 frc5460 32 -12 39 frc3546 31 -2 40 frc2054 31 9 41 frc5084 31 -14 42 frc217 31 -1 43 frc5878 31 -11 44 frc3357 31 -1 45 frc3234 31 2 46 frc3452 31 -10 47 frc2619 30 -7 48 frc3655 30 8 49 frc1684 30 -3 50 frc3536 30 14 51 frc1250 30 1 52 frc3618 29 1 53 frc5448 29 -9 54 frc5167 29 -3 55 frc3602 29 6 56 frc2586 28 -6 57 frc4377 28 -2 58 frc85 28 0 59 frc2337 28 1 60 frc3539 28 9 61 frc3770 28 -26 62 frc6098 27 -5 63 frc6193 27 -29 64 frc2612 27 3 65 frc3707 27 3 66 frc3656 26 21 67 frc4384 26 -13 68 frc74 26 10 69 frc4216 26 -6 70 frc5907 26 13 71 frc68 26 8 72 frc1718 26 0 73 frc5230 26 17 74 frc1025 26 2 75 frc1711 25 -4 76 frc4776 25 8 77 frc503 25 -3 78 frc6121 25 3 79 frc4680 25 14 80 frc3414 24 -10 81 frc6075 24 -1 82 frc5155 24 4 83 frc2137 23 -6 84 frc123 23 -2 85 frc2604 23 -12 86 frc2611 23 9 87 frc5166 23 -22 88 frc5114 23 -22 89 frc5203 22 -1 90 frc66 22 -1 91 frc3668 22 -16 92 frc3886 22 -1 93 frc4381 21 5 94 frc6097 21 -9 95 frc2959 20 1 96 frc5222 20 -2 97 frc3538 20 -5 98 frc5502 19 -1 99 frc1322 19 3 100 frc5090 19 0 101 frc3767 18 0 102 frc5926 18 -3 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
Quote:
However, I suspect higher tower strength would also have caused several teams to play differently. I look forward to the style of play this change will cause at CMP. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
Seems like a pretty straightforward change. In the New England District at least, by the latter end of competition season (and especially at District Champs) you were regularly seeing both alliances get the breach ranking point every single match. It often came down to which team could score more boulders. Increasing the tower strength only seems to up the ante. It's obviously going to favor the teams who can score quickly and consistently. As others have said, having a tower score <-2 wasn't particularly uncommon amongst the upper caliber of teams, so I'm skeptical about the magnitude of change this rule will make. I think the obvious conclusion is that it will separate the good/quick shooting bots from the exceptional/rapid shooting bots. Things like 2-ball autonomous code will be even more valuable going into worlds.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower Strength Raised to 10 for CMP
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|