FIRST LGBT+ (A blog by and about LGBT+ people in FIRST)

[Kevin Sevcik]

Originally Posted by nrgy_blast

<1%, you say? Good point, definitely shouldn't separate anyone based on any sexual attribute.

The problem here is that without knowing the reasoning behind such a rule, it's hard to explain why it might be problematic and counter-productive. I mean, maybe it's a perfectly appropriate rule that efficiently achieves its goal and I'm just unclear on the intended goal. Anonymous123 says going outside that rule is a "lawsuit waiting to happen". What would this lawsuit be about? We're all FIRSTers here, gimme a blue box on that "No opposite sexes rooming together" rule.