|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Quote:
217-3476-4678-188 beat the #1, #2, and #3 seeds in Newton. Clearly the #7 alliance just got lucky. What a shame. /s |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Quote:
I didn't say that the #7 alliance got lucky. I was just saying that 708 falling over in match 1 was bad luck for the #1 alliance. The #7 alliance deserves to be on Einstein. Before you guys jump to conclusions on what I said please read and understand what I wrote. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
What was the reason for the DQ in the semi finals?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
I have to say, I'm really impressed with 217. Going from being the second pick of the sixteenth seed in MSC to being the seventh seeded alliance captain that bests some of the greatest robots this year is not easy. Congrats to them, and to 3476, 4678, and 188! Well done!
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Quote:
Watching them and the rest of their alliance play on Einstein and hang right there with an alliance that had as good a shot at a world championship, in my opinion, as anyone was very impressive. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Thanks, that had a wacky title on it, so I missed what it was about.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
All of 1676's full-field footage of the 2016 Newton Eliminations has now been posted here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...9R14DZnbqgem-I. Our videos of the Qualification Matches, Alliance Selections, and Awards Ceremony are currently uploading and will also be published in that playlist. Enjoy!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Newton Subdivision
Being on the winning alliance for Newton was a fabulous experience. Never in our wildest dreams did we expect to be on the winning alliance of such a high-caliber division. Team 4678 is very grateful to teams 217, 3476 and 188 for being our partners in this wonderful experience.
Being the 3rd member of the alliance, we were very curious how well we contributed to the level of scoring our alliance was able to achieve. We know that it's usually the top 2 teams that are responsible for the majority of the points scored in a match. We suspected that might have been a bit different with our alliance and the analysis of the video footage would suggest that is how we managed to succeed on the Newton field. We may have gotten a few things wrong in our analysis of the video footage but we think we got it pretty close. Have a look at the spreadsheet for the details. It turns out 217, 3476 and 4678 were practically equal. Each team contributed an average of very close to 60 points per game not including the breach and capture points. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|