|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Upset Percentage
To rephrase, and hopefully garner some more conversation/thoughts, here are the outcomes and calculations.
Each field has 4 Quarterfinal pairings (Q), 2 Semifinal pairings (S) and one Final pairing (F) for a total of 7 pairings. With 8 division fields and Einstein, we have 9 fields total, with 7 pairings each, for a total of [edit fixed: 63] pairings. Pairings with upsets: Archimedes Alliance 3/2 - S - 1 Carson Alliance 5/4 - Q - 2 Alliance 7/2 - Q - 3 Alliance 4/1 - S - 4 Alliance 4/3 - F - 5 Carver Alliance 5/4 - Q - 6 Alliance 6/3 - Q - 7 Alliance 2/1 - F - 8 Curie Alliance 8/1 - Q - 9 Alliance 7/2 - Q - 10 Alliance 6/3 - Q - 11 Alliance 5/4 - Q - 12 Alliance 8/5 - S - 13 Alliance 7/6 - S - 14 Alliance 8/7 - F - 15 Galileo Alliance 6/3 - Q - 16 Alliance 6/2 - Q - 17 Hopper Alliance 7/2 - Q - 18 Newton Alliance 7/2 - Q - 19 Alliance 7/3 - S - 20 Alliance 7/1 - F - 21 Tesla Alliance 3/2 - S - 22 Einstein Alliance 8/1 - Q - 23 Alliance 7/2 - Q - 24 Alliance 6/3 - Q - 25 Alliance 6/4 - S - 26 Alliance 7/6 - F - 27 Above you see that 27 out of those edit [63] pairings were upsets, giving us an upset rating of 42.8%. So has anyone in FIRST ever seen anything quite this unpredictable before, or was this the most unpredictable Championship you've seen? Why? Last edited by AndyBare : 01-05-2016 at 21:17. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|