|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
It's a tough call, but overall I would say no.
On the one hand, we did cycles through the low bar since it was easy to pick up boulders from the secret passage/human player. On the other hand, the size constraints and our bot design limited us to the point that we would have had to give up our low bar capabilities to climb. Like I said before though we were a low bar bot, so the tradeoff of climbing vs changing our entire strategy up before CMP wasn't worth it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
No, the low bar wasn't worth all of the broken arm gearboxes.
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
NO!
And I wish my team listened to me. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
The low bar was kinda worth it for us and ill explain.
At first glance we chose the low bar for the quick cycle times and easy crossing. It forced our designs to be cheaper (less material usage) and made a low cog and light robot easier to obtain. My favorite advantage however is not competitive at all. My favorite thing is that our robot fit inside normal sized cars. Allowing our team to go all over practicing and now doing demos without having to ask for the school truck. As we transition to trying to become a chairmans team having a small robot that is extremely easy to transport is going to help a lot. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
Yes. We had fast climber, averaged about 6 high goals at champs, (partly because we could fly under the low bar to get more). And we were 5 points away from Einstein. I can't think of much we would have done different.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Was the Low Bar worth it?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|