|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy during Final at Einstein
Kudo to civilized banter; I thought it might be difficult, but this is reassuring. Nice input from teams involved so thanks. Even if we had been there we wouldn't have been able to view all the division brackets at once so there is not much back story of Einstein alliances.
Looking up some of the stats, it is hard to make the case that switching to an offensive lineup might have helped. The first thing I noted was that Carver's OPR's were significantly less than Tesla's going into Einstein. And no wonder, Carver's was the second seed alliance. (more on this later) So from these numbers, it is harder to believe that Carver could keep up with Tesla. Therefore, defense had a significant impact on the matches. Carver Seed 2 OPR The Beach Bot 330 55.94 Roboteers 2481 50.96 Cleveland's Team 120 43.79 Blue Cheese 1086 43.07 Tesla Seed 1 OP Robotics 2056 68.08 Orbit 1690 69.8 Ranger Robotics 3015 36.48 Finney Falcons 1405 25.91 Speaking of OPR's it is notable that in most division the top two teams offensive rating was past the knee of the curve. Except for Newton but this has already been covered heavily on CD... but the notable thing with Newton is that almost all of those teams were upset even before Einstein. Then Newton was shut out of Einstein immediately. However, it is more a question to my mind that more divisions are not like Newton was. Are high scoring robots on that end of the spectrum that rare, that in each division only 2 or 3 stand out even on a national level? I expect this in the districts, but nationally it is harder to rationalize. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|