Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard
2169 from 2013 is one of my favorite case studies in good strategic analysis. Brilliant design and executed to perfection, although I wouldn't define it as . 2014 you really can't argue for anyone but 254 or maybe 469, although I'm sure 2014 was a breakout year for 2481, it wasn't a "dominant machine" in the way that the previously mentioned teams were.
|
Interestingly, by the time champs rolled around, 1425 was actually better than 2169 (I'm looking at OPR here, not at how far each team went, since 2169's alliance did beat 1425's).
of course, 118 beat out both of them on the OPR scale, so what does that tell you about Feeder shooter vs cycling
I'd argue for 469 or 987 in 2013, though I think the beauty of that game was that it was literally impossible to be a complete powerhouse (my team tried to do everything. we failed miserably
)
I know I exaggerated a bit, but NASA put a man on the moon with less processing than some FRC bots. Think about that for a minute. - JesseK [more] 
Threaded Mode