paper: 2016 FRC Championship History

[araniaraniratul]

Hey Jim,

Awesome spreadsheet as always. Just noticed a few things. I think a few world champions are listed as finalist for some reason. I'm not sure if you did that for the weight tapering system or it was just oversight, but just a thought I had. For example, I know that in 2001, 365 and 294 both were WC, but are listed and WF.

[Peter Matteson]

Originally Posted by araniaraniratul

Hey Jim,

Awesome spreadsheet as always. Just noticed a few things. I think a few world champions are listed as finalist for some reason. I'm not sure if you did that for the weight tapering system or it was just oversight, but just a thought I had. For example, I know that in 2001, 365 and 294 both were WC, but are listed and WF.

I noted this in the previous version as well.
The points appeared to be correct in the old version even though they weren't listed as WC.

[Steven Smith]

Thanks for putting this together again!

3005 was listed as a Division Winner for Curie on the main rollup screen (Green W), but we were actually division finalists. It looks like the points calculation, ranking, and subsequent data screens are all correct based on our Division Finalist finish.

Spot checking a few others on the list, it appears 3166 had a similar issue, and possibly some others.