|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes justin, I agree with what you said
the scoring for finals this year was horrible, 2 out of 3 is better, and easier for spectators to understand. go with raw scores for QPs. it is simpler to understand. the games could be better. The last 2 years the game has seemed promising in the beginning, but at competitions it turned out into the same thing every match. The amount of competition is going down, to far. The whole part about FIRST giving each team a list of what matches they are in and who their alliance partner and opponents are for the match is a bad idea in my opinion. They should have done it like they did in 2001. they gave you a list that looked like the following MATCHES 1, 2, 3 Team 1 Team 2 team 3 team 4 team 5 team 6 team 7 team 8 team 9 team 10 team 11 team 12 They would tell you who you alliance partners were when you were called to the staging area. It made things interesting. It was more challenging, an didnt emphasize so much on the whole scouting thing. It gave a good challenge of being able to work somethin out for a strategy in a very short time. They need to design a game that guarantees a different match every time. 2003 turned out to be whoever knocked the pyramid over first would win. It was boring. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| Cal Game 2003 date decided... Who is interested? | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 15 | 02-06-2003 06:48 |
| in response to the 2003 game suspicion | Sachiel7 | Rumor Mill | 5 | 02-02-2003 22:47 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |
| About 2003 Game!!! | Wetzel | Rumor Mill | 12 | 27-08-2002 16:24 |