|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
How does the team in Thunder Bay, ON, (4732) feel about the transition? It's a 12-hour drive or couple hour flight to the nearest event (North Bay). Two events will be a step up from their usual of attending only one Toronto-area regional.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
As much as I think the move to the district model is great, with lower prices and all that, I'm going to miss competing with teams from far away at the Waterloo Regional (only a 5 minute drive from my team's high school!). Being on an alliance with 148 this year was absolutely incredible. Plus, even though I wasn't on the team in 2014, just seeing 254 at that year's WR was wicked cool.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
That really depends on how many open spots are left. For most districts, they pick the lowest number of events required to support two plays for their district teams. That leaves few spots for third plays. Given the scheduling for registering for 3rd plays, very few spots are available for inter-district play.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
I'm also worried for team 4704 (Timmins), which I assume would have an even harder time raising the funds to do districts. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
If Michigan Districts fill up, there are usually a few open slots down in Indiana. Not as close as Michigan, but it's only one state further south.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
To add to the irony, Alaska is able to send teams to PNW district events, meaning that Vancouver teams are surrounded by a district they cannot (at present) join. Nothing against the Calgary regional (both teams had a great time there), but it makes poor environmental and economic logic to drive over 12 hours to get to an event when you have events one hour and three hours drive from your school. Knowing several key people involved in both Ontario and PNW, I have faith that over time they will be able to make districts work out really well for ALL the teams... not just the 95% of teams that currently see a huge benefit from the district model. Congratulations to Ontario on going district. I've been volunteering in the PNW for a few years now, and while I'm blown away by the commitment of the key volunteers, it has been great for the teams that can take part in it. Jason |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
I am very excited to hear Ontario is making the transition.
Some tips: 1. Have at least 1 mentor or former student from your team sign up to be an inspector. Commitments for inspecting can be relatively light, and a lot of inspectors make light work. Students heavily involved in build (typically electrical or mechanical) tend to work out well. 2. Refs are also typically of high demand. I will not pretend I know what it takes, but I know a lot of former students a couple years out of the program tend to do a good job for us in Michigan. This is a higher pressure role than inspecting. I have heard former competition team students do well in this role as long as they do not hold grudges. 3. Try to get parents involved with some of the other non-key volunteer roles for events. I smile every year that I see one parent of students that graduated in 2009 still helping with scoring table at a couple events each year. 4. Talk with your sponsors about whether or not they could spare someone for Judging. For many regions, the switch to District system can be a great spur for growth. Keep this in mind and have key volunteers look for other prospects to help in their roles for future years. Congratulations again. The first year can be very scary and will be a lot of hard work, but once you have completed a District Championship, it is hard to imagine going back. Hopefully I will see a couple teams from Canada next year at my Michigan events. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
Yes, referees always seem to be in high demand. As Ike said, alumni are a great resource to pull from. Speaking as an alum turned referee (turned unofficial referee recruiter and trainer), it's great to have people familiar with how FRC games typically work transition to reffing. It's much easier to train them than, say, a parent from a team. I've noticed the "best" alumni referees seem to have either been on drive team or the head scouts on their former teams. These are the positions that usually know the games and rules the best. It's a high pressure job, but you also get the "best seat in the house" as one of my former head referees used to say. I highly recommend it for alumni who want to remain involved in first without necessarily mentoring a team. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
As far as "in high demand"... can I double that? I'd like to not end up in stripes at 4 events again next year (two of them I wasn't planning on that...). (Though I've got a funny feeling that I'll be recruited to do just that...) |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
I think teams should be able to request to join a district. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
It's the teams that are in the district system that cannot request to go to a traditional regional instead, and vice versa. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
As far as I know, Regional teams cannot in any way compete at a District event. I am far removed from being in a District area though, do I have this wrong in my mind? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ontario Moving to District Model in 2017
Quote:
Edit: :s/attend/register Last edited by GreyingJay : 15-06-2016 at 13:59. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|