|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
It would be better to send more of the international teams to Houston. Or locations like Nebraska that have similar drive times to both. Last edited by notmattlythgoe : 20-06-2016 at 11:21. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
One way to fix the qualifying space issue is to reduce the number of teams that qualify. I'm not suggesting don't qualify Rookies or EI or Chairman's. I'm suggesting going back to 2v2. Or 2v2v2.
With 2v2, you will see fewer matches at a given event, however, at district events, the increased time between matches may be welcome (but I'll be on the opposite side where 60 team regionals will be LUCKY to get 8 matches). Could make sense if the current indication is only 50 teams in a division though... But with 2v2v2, you get the best of both worlds. Still have 6 teams on a field a time, so you don't see any change to the current schedules or expectations of match numbers. But you only qualify 2(3) instead of 3(4) teams from an event. Then you only need 6 divisions of 75 and Einstein is some sort of weird round-robin type tournament where everyone plays everyone. But then we need #3Champs. Nevermind ![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
In practice - almost all of the international teams are going to attend Houston. The only international regions zoned north have tiny populations to make it appear that international teams were divided evenly.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
-Mike |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
So... What happens when Minnesota switches over to districts? Currently they only having 24 champion slots from their regional, but at 208 teams they would need 29 more slots*. So either some region is going to have to move to the south or north will have to be 420 teams and last years winners with no waitlist.
*At the 25.6% listed in the original post Minnesota would send 53 teams. Last edited by Drakxii : 20-06-2016 at 12:09. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
Also, (as stated in the original post) FIRST is going to have to change how they determine the number of teams that get sent by a district region. Right now they are over capacity if a handful of northern teams win southern regionals. (Actually, I forgot about Legacy teams in the original post, so they are already over 400). And finally, I don't see Minnesota moving to districts in the foreseeable future (5+ years). FIRST wants all DCMPs to be week 6, meaning that Minnesota will need three fields and way more key volunteers to fit in the schedule. Too many threads have been derailed by Minnesota District discussion, so if someone wants to continue this conversation please make a new thread for it. Good catch, I could have sworn I saw the 400 number somewhere, but I cannot find it now. If they keep FTC in the separate dome they could fit more than 400 teams at the NSR. (I don't think they've ever done more than 100 team divisions though). Last edited by AGPapa : 20-06-2016 at 12:31. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: North Championship vs South Championship
I read that as "We will attempt to get 400 teams there but it may be 398-399 depending on the last minute invites."
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|