|
|
|
| You send me into orbit. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your favorite feature of the SD540? | |||
| Light Weight |
|
25 | 20.33% |
| Low Cost |
|
47 | 38.21% |
| Multi-Bank Option |
|
31 | 25.20% |
| I do not like this product. |
|
47 | 38.21% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Can someone outside of Virginia comment on their experiences with these motor controllers? Just looking to eliminate any potential regional bias.
|
|
#167
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Quote:
|
|
#168
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
I'm not affiliated with the company, but I do those that used it to post Amazon reviews. That's a strong factor in me selecting or not selecting a part.
Currently, there is only one review and it's very negative. |
|
#169
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Quote:
This review echoes many of the concerns myself and others had when this product was initially announced. -Mike |
|
#170
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
I read that Amazon review. That may have been an earlier model. The single banks that we used had a black molded case and held up very well. We also used two double banks. They were 3-D printed, but they too had no issues.
|
|
#171
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Quote:
|
|
#172
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Pictures?
|
|
#173
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Were they 3D printed or were they molded?
|
|
#174
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
The single banks we used had black molded casings. The multi-bank options had the 3-D printed casings. All controllers worked great. The product page has pictures of the older gray 3-D printed casings and the black molded casings that we received.
Here is the link: http://www.mindsensors.com/frc/135-s...roller-for-frc |
|
#175
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
I just don't see how to get over this huge difference in performance;
http://www.ctr-electronics.com/downl...er-Testing.pdf |
|
#176
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
I truly hope they didn't lose too much money with these things. Frc doesn't need more motor controllers at this point and there was really nothing special about these that made them worth the risk..
Frc could use more cots components however. |
|
#177
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
I remember these being the cheapest when they came out, but perhaps the SPARKs came out after the SD540's and dove below the price point? Am I remembering this correctly?
Aren't all legal motor controllers COTS components? So simultaneously FRC does and doesn't need more motor controllers? |
|
#178
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Really? I thought the multi-bank feature sounded pretty cool. Sure the other specs of the controller are less desirable but maybe the next iteration will be better.
|
|
#179
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
Quote:
|
|
#180
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SD540 Motor Controller
QFT - usually tech gets better with more iterations, and this one definitely has a niche that isn't seen elsewhere. For performance, there's "THE FASTEST!" vs 'fast enough', and I think the SD540's demonstrated the latter just fine.
Last edited by JesseK : 21-06-2016 at 12:30. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|