|
Re: pic: Stronghold AMAA Live with Frank 6/21 8:30PM EST!
I'm a bit late to the party here, but I have a question:
Why not base wildcard distribution on a more holistic standard, e.g. district points, rather than simply finalist alliance position? District points are designed to be an all-encompassing measure of competitive success, so why use a simpler, less thorough method that ignores results that FIRST has deemed important (qualification rank, alliance selection, awards) in determining which teams have succeeded most at a district event?
__________________
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 2791 - Shaker Robotics
2016: Tech Valley SF (5236, 2791, 3624) and Quality, Finger Lakes SF (5254, 2791, 2383), Battlecry@WPI Winner (195, 2791, 501), Robot Rumble Winner (2791, 195, 6463)
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2016: Mount Olive Winner (1257, 5624, 1676), Bridgewater-Raritan Finalist (1257, 25, 3340, 555) and GP, MAR CMP Winner (225, 341, 1257), Archimedes SF (4003, 4564, 5842, 1257), IRI Invite
2012-2015, Student, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2015: Mount Olive QF (1257, 1811, 1923) and Safety Award, North Brunswick Finalist (11, 193, 1257) and Team Spirit and Safety Awards
2014: Clifton Winner (1626, 869, 1257), MAR CMP QF (1257, 293, 303)
2013: TCNJ Safety Award
2012: Mount Olive QF (204, 303, 1257)
|
Chiefdelphi is a great resource for all of FIRST to use over the years and has grown into a community that has taken a life of it's own. - Koko Ed [more] 
21-06-2016, 20:18
Threaded Mode