|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
As for the low goal bots, I'd argue others, like 1011 and 25, will be selected as well. Both were excellent low goal bots. Some of the most dangerous alliances at IRI will probably be two really accurate high goal shooters with a low goal bot to drop off boulders in the courtyard for the two high goal shooters to pick up. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Thank you. Glad you liked it. Now let's see it actually happen.
![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
Defense is fun. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
On the topic of awesome IRI upsets *cough* |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Yeah. Your alliance last year was kind of awesome.
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
195 is on fire this year. They've been to seven events in the official and offseason winning all of them while seeding #1 at five of them.
Cyberknights will be a strong captain or one of the first few picks. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Another prediction...
No alliance at IRI will score more than 300 points. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Well...
30 - Auto Cross 40 - Auto Boulders (someone has a 2 ball) 35 - Tele Cross (all 5 defenses damaged) 45 - 3 Scales =150 points (Not including teleop boulders or breach/capture) In quals: 300-150 = 150 150/5 = 30 30 boulders in the high goal during teleop In elims: 45 - Breach/Capture 300-195 = 105 105/5 = 21 In a near perfect match in elims, Only 21 boulder need to be scored in the high goal during teleop. That's 7 boulders each robot. Very unlikely but definitely possible. |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Einstein finals match 3, the winners put in 17 high goals. That's almost double of what we usually let through our defense. 21 is possible.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
If our high goal auto had worked and 195 had scaled that match, it would have been 270. Again, this is with only two shooting robots. 300 is definitely possible at IRI. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
Besides, only one of the robots on that alliance was good enough to get into IRI ![]() |
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IRI 2016 Predictions
Well, you averaged letting up 13.4 high goals per game at Einstein. 17 isn't really close to 27 in that perspective. You did have an incredible performance at Finger Lakes though, at an average of 2 teleop high goals during playoffs, admittedly against weaker teams than IRI caliber.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|