|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should there be official inter-district play? | |||
| Yes |
|
25 | 56.82% |
| Yes, but we probably wouldn't use it |
|
9 | 20.45% |
| No |
|
10 | 22.73% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
- One of the complaints people have about districts is that they see the same teams over and over again. Opening the borders would allow different teams to enter the district. - Some teams on the borders of districts are closer to events in another district than their own. This would allow those teams to decrease their travel costs by opening their options up more. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
- This would reduce travel costs, but what about registration costs? |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
- Obviously some decisions would need made on who gets the $1k for the team, would it be split? Would the owning district keep it all? I imagine this could be decided between districts that opt to participate, maybe CHS would send $500 per team for the first 5 teams that opt to participate in a NC event. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
I would be 100% behind a process to allow border teams to join an adjacent district for a few years while teams/events build up in their area. Teams would earn points in the adjacent district then compete in the adjacent DCMP, they would earn zero points in their original home district. This would be a temporary and voluntary fix for that issue. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
FYI it is not something that personally bothers me. However, having to see me multiple times a year I can understand why teams want to go elsewhere... |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
There are already opportunities to compete out of district or at a regional to see other teams. So the complaint is not valid when it comes to earning district points out of your home district. I completely understand it is easier for teams to justify competing out of district if they can earn points while doing it, but is it reasonable to change the entire district system in FIRST to accommodate a handful of teams that don't like seeing their neighbor teams 'over and over'?
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
Why could this not be piloted by CHS, MAR, and NC? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
I see both pros and cons to letting points count across district lines, but I'd love to see some changes to registration so that we can see teams in other regions without jumping through dozens of hurdles. Being able to sign up for a NE or CHS event first and have it count for points would make it significantly easier for us to do that, but I recognize that "official inter-district play" isn't the only solution to that problem. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
In my opinion, I say no.
My first reason is that qualifying to go to Champs from your district intrinsically means you did better than the other teams in your area. That's the way it should be. Introducing points from other districts could be detrimental to this. For example, if a team that wouldn't otherwise make it (but close) from FIM goes to play in Peachtree, it is clear that they will qualify. However, this means that the best in FIM are not being represented. That's a problem. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
We are 10 miles from the southern border of CHS, making NC district events lucrative to us financially. Last season NC was struggling to fill some of their events while CHS is looking at possibly needing to add an additional event for 2017. Inter-district play would benefit both districts. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official Inter-District Interest
Here is my very selfish reason why I voted no:
My team intends to register for a non-FiM district early in the season next year (Wks 1-3) to get some inexpensive practice in for our two districts that count (Wks 3-6). If Inter-District Play becomes counted, we lose that option (unless we can opt out of counting that event's points). Regionals are a lot more money, a lot less matches, more days I have to take off work, and a lot smaller chance of making the playoff. A District Event offers us much more practice potential. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|