Go to Post Cosmic background radiation is not an approved bumper material. - Nate Laverdure [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-07-2016, 14:07
Ernst's Avatar
Ernst Ernst is offline
Ernst
AKA: Ernst
FRC #1732 (Hilltoppers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 297
Ernst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond reputeErnst has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASD20 View Post
There is a big difference between saying that 4th bots should not exist and belittling the achievements of the 4th bots that do exist. It is the exact same as the difference between saying that 2 Champs shouldn't exist and saying that the winning alliances don't deserve to be called winners (which will be a thread within 30 minutes of the end of Einstein next year). By saying that the 4th bot shouldn't be considered a winner, you are not telling FIRST that you think that they should get rid of 4 bot alliances, you are insulting a team who already probably is doubting their self-worth. If you don't think 4th bots should exist email FIRST, but right now they do, so according to the manual they are considered a full member of the winning alliance and should be treated as such. Plenty of teams hate the bumper rules, but just because you think the bumper rules should change, does not mean you can just show up for a competition with no bumpers. This is no different.
I think 4th bots are a great idea because they make a ton of logistical sense and can allow for some really interesting strategies if alliances plan and use them well. For example, if we hadn't broken, being able to field us as a defensive threat or a decently capable backup bot could have been a huge strategic benefit for the alliance. But we didn't work. So we didn't contribute on the field. So I don't doubt our worth during those matches; I know it was next to nothing.

The only people who really know how much a 4th bot contributed are the members of that team and their alliance. Everyone else can really only form their judgments based on what they see on the field. If a member of a 4th bot team doesn't feel like a full member of the alliance, why would you question that? 3rd and 4th bots can and do get carried. If the alliance wins, they're a member of that alliance, so they also win. But contributions to that blue banner vary, and it diminishes the work of, for example, 1st and 2nd bots to say that their backup bot who didn't play did just as much as they did and is just as deserving as they are. People need to be honest with themselves about this.
__________________
FIRST Team 1732- Hilltopper Robotics
Website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:27.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi