|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Texas isn't moving to districts yet
Texas will stay in the regional model for at least one more year. This email was sent out this morning to team contacts.
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
A bummer but I'm not terribly surprised. I was much more surprised to hear that a proposal even went to HQ.
Hopefully how close we were to going districts for 2017 will up the involvement in a positive way for 2018 however. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
I'm definitely interested in seeing Texas' implementation of districts next year. I'm not very familiar with Texas with regards to the distribution of FRC teams, but looking at some population density maps (Texas, Minnesota) and a 2013 FRC teams map, it would appear as though Texas and Minnesota have some similar challenges in figuring out how to spread out their resources.
In particular, the northern bit of Texas looks fairly isolated. I'm curious as to how many volunteers they have in that region, how many district events will be located there, etc. If anyone knows the answers to these questions, I'd be interested to hear more! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
A regional in El Paso or Corpus Christi would actually be my preference.
Those regions need the most help to build volunteer bases and team growth. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
Its always next year. :eyeroll:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas isn't moving to districts yet
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|