Go to Post Ultrasonic sensors will allow you to do fundamentally the same thing that the bump sensors do...so you can slow down and smoothly stop your robot just before it reaches the end wall, instead of running into it at full speed and then figuring out "ohh! there is a wall there!" - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-07-2016, 21:32
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,224
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knufire View Post
The pulleys that VEX and AM sell are 5mm pitch HTD, so that's what most FRC teams use. Usually 9mm or 15mm wide. You can also run GT2 tooth profile belts on HTD pulleys.
If you use a GT2 profile with HTD pulleys, it's not supposed to add any benefit, so generally speaking it's better to just stick with HTD for availability purposes.
The lower limit (and it's a sketchy one) for 5mm pitch 9mm wide HTD belt pulleys is 24t apparently for a typical year (read: not this year). I believe that 36t is safer than using 24t, especially if it's your first time. If you use 15mm wide belts I'm not sure, but 24t is supposed to be safe with those.
You would be better served asking "Chris is me" because I'm just parroting what he says at this point. A quick search on google should turn up some relevant threads about belt sizes.
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>

Reply With Quote
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-07-2016, 21:36
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,655
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewMatic View Post
But back to the belts... What sizes would you recommend. I know 100% that the sizes may vary between years and robots.
We ran belt our second year (2013 Ultimate Ascent) for the lighter-duty portion of our climber, and for our frisbee feeder (or more precisely, frisbee arrestor), and in our fourth year (2015 Recycle Rush) for the drive system exactly according to the AM-14U2 plans. IIRC, all were stock 15 tpi belt.

Obviously an edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by troy_dietz View Post
I think you may have your games mixed up a bit.
Yes, RR is RR is RR. I also fixed this above...
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.

Last edited by GeeTwo : 19-07-2016 at 22:08.
Reply With Quote
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-07-2016, 21:38
troy_dietz's Avatar
troy_dietz troy_dietz is offline
3D printing and Alliance Captain
FRC #0330 (The Beach Bots)
Team Role: Human Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Hermosa Beach
Posts: 111
troy_dietz is on a distinguished road
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo View Post
...(2015 Rebound Rumble)...
I think you may have your games mixed up a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-07-2016, 01:10
Cothron Theiss's Avatar
Cothron Theiss Cothron Theiss is online now
Registered Muser
FRC #4462 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Kingston, Tennessee
Posts: 548
Cothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewMatic View Post
But back to the belts... What sizes would you recommend. I know 100% that the sizes may vary between years and robots. But I'm not sure on the standard belt sizes due to the inexperience with the topic.
Others who have run custom drivetrains with belt would be able to tell you better, but the numbers Sam posted are great to start with. Though if you need to run smaller sprockets than what is recommended, you can always incorporate idler sprockets/bearings into your belt run to increase the amount of wrap you have on your pulleys. This adds weight and complexity, but it is an option.
__________________
"It's taking longer than expected, which was to be expected."
Reply With Quote
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-08-2016, 18:38
lark95's Avatar
lark95 lark95 is offline
Red Ranger
AKA: Joe L.
FRC #3418 (RoboRiot)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconson
Posts: 123
lark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Sorry it took a bit longer than expected to get the pics but here they are. This is the chain break that we made to break #35 chain so that we could get away from using master links. The chain is aligned in the line of of holes on the bottom while a pin is pressed down with the handle. It works great for us and is really fast as it does not use any other tools at all.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3432 (2).JPG
Views:	85
Size:	98.5 KB
ID:	20956  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3431 (1).JPG
Views:	57
Size:	124.6 KB
ID:	20957  
__________________
FRC Rebound Rumble | Ultimate Ascent | Aerial Assist | Recycle Rush | FIRST Stronghold | FIRST STEAMWORKS
FLL Senior Solutions | Nature's Fury | Trash Treck | Animal Allies

Last edited by lark95 : 09-08-2016 at 08:43.
Reply With Quote
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-08-2016, 18:41
Lireal Lireal is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex Colello
FRC #2141 (Spartonics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Concord, California
Posts: 113
Lireal has a spectacular aura aboutLireal has a spectacular aura aboutLireal has a spectacular aura about
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lark95 View Post
Sorry it took a bit longer than expected to get the pics but here they are. This is the chain break that we made to break #35 chain so that we could get away from using master links. The chain is aligned in the line of of holes on the bottom while a pin is pressed down with the handle. It works great for us and is really fast as it does not use any other tools at all.

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui...92c66_0.1& zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui...d904a_0.1& zw
The links don't work right now. It looks like they are links to email attachments. Can you upload them to google drive or similar and share them that way?
Reply With Quote
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-08-2016, 08:43
lark95's Avatar
lark95 lark95 is offline
Red Ranger
AKA: Joe L.
FRC #3418 (RoboRiot)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconson
Posts: 123
lark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lark95 View Post
Sorry it took a bit longer than expected to get the pics but here they are. This is the chain break that we made to break #35 chain so that we could get away from using master links. The chain is aligned in the line of of holes on the bottom while a pin is pressed down with the handle. It works great for us and is really fast as it does not use any other tools at all.
Fixed it, the pics are visible now.
__________________
FRC Rebound Rumble | Ultimate Ascent | Aerial Assist | Recycle Rush | FIRST Stronghold | FIRST STEAMWORKS
FLL Senior Solutions | Nature's Fury | Trash Treck | Animal Allies

Last edited by lark95 : 09-08-2016 at 08:45.
Reply With Quote
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-08-2016, 14:42
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 910
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lark95 View Post
Sorry it took a bit longer than expected to get the pics but here they are. This is the chain break that we made to break #35 chain so that we could get away from using master links. The chain is aligned in the line of of holes on the bottom while a pin is pressed down with the handle. It works great for us and is really fast as it does not use any other tools at all.
How do you assemble chain onto the robot? Or do you always create a loop of known length and wrap it around un-tensioned sprockets?
__________________


2016 | Innovation In Controls, Industrial Design, Quality Award, NC District - 4th Seed
Reply With Quote
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-08-2016, 18:10
lark95's Avatar
lark95 lark95 is offline
Red Ranger
AKA: Joe L.
FRC #3418 (RoboRiot)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconson
Posts: 123
lark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of lightlark95 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron View Post
How do you assemble chain onto the robot? Or do you always create a loop of known length and wrap it around un-tensioned sprockets?
We always just create known length loops like you said. With how much #35 stretches on something like a drive train through out a season, we find that we always need chain tensioners anyway so it really is not to big a deal.
__________________
FRC Rebound Rumble | Ultimate Ascent | Aerial Assist | Recycle Rush | FIRST Stronghold | FIRST STEAMWORKS
FLL Senior Solutions | Nature's Fury | Trash Treck | Animal Allies
Reply With Quote
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-08-2016, 10:44
fargus111111111's Avatar
fargus111111111 fargus111111111 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tim W
FRC #0343 (Metal in Motion)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 102
fargus111111111 is on a distinguished road
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Belt vs chain, in my 4 years, relatively short compared to many of these people, I have not seen a lot of difference if the shafts the belt/chain is on are attached to the same plate, when you start getting joints in between it gets a little hairy with belts, but we have only broken a chain once, and that was on our t-shirt shooter while driving in the grass and all its drive is 25 chain, our 2012 robot, a very similar design, uses 35 chain from the gearbox to the center axle, then 25 from the center axle to the end axles and we have never had any problems. On the belt side, the past 3 years we have used belts in the drive and never experienced any issues, our 2014 bot is still running all original parts, except the wheels. 2014 and 2015 we used the standard kit base and 2016 we used a modified version of the Rhino Track system. (custom fit to our Breckoflex tracks) We have used poly cord in the past as well, the last time was 2012, but the stuff is quite useful for intakes, our 2006 robot uses a crazy pulley system and a bunch of poly cord to run the intake and spiral ball storage system off one motor. Poly cord can't take too much torque, but sometimes that is a good thing and the cord is not near as picky about alignment as long as you have deep pulleys and if needed you can even make it turn on multiple planes.
__________________
I didn't break it... this time.
Reply With Quote
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-08-2016, 12:53
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,108
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Some thoughts, from my personal experience:

Belts are more sensitive to C-C distance. Chain is more sensitive to alignment. I've never once, in my many years of FRC, seen a timing belt jump off a pulley (exclusively using flanged pulleys, admittedly, has helped with this). I've seen chain jump off not-quite-aligned sprockets more times than I can count. However, I've seen plenty of not-quite-tight-enough belts ratchet, whereas chain will only ratchet if it's basically falling-off-loose.

Complicating this fact for chain is the tendency to stretch, which is not a problem with belt. Once a belt is properly set up, you can forget about it. Chain, not so much.

The upshot of this is that chains will (almost) always require either tensioners or adjustability at one end of the run. On the flip side, if you don't have the machining capability do to precise C-C distances, so will belt.

Belts are much, much quieter, which is a bigger benefit than you'd think.

Chain can be put on in-place without moving a sprocket, via. masterlink. Belts cannot.

Chains can transfer a much higher maximum load, given the size of belts used in FRC. If you're limited in your pulley diameter or belt width, or if you just have a mechanism with whopping forces involved, this can matter.

This isn't rigorous at all (so take it with a grain of salt), but belts seem to be less-prone to bizarre one-off undiagnosable failures than chain. A fair number of times I've seen chain fall off drives with no visible faults, with no hint of the cause and no subsequent failures despite nothing being changed. I have seen a grand total of one belt failure in my entire time in FRC.

My teams tend to use belts, because we value reliability and belts basically never fail.

On #25 vs. #35 chain, my advice is to avoid the former unless you are certain of your team's machining precision. As I mentioned, #35 chain is already more sensitive to mis-aligned sprockets than belts - but #25 chain is *far* more sensitive than #35 chain, still. If you cannot align the sprockets extremely well, it will fail. My teams, which machine almost exclusively with a chopsaw and a drillpress, have abandoned #25 chain for this reason, and we do not regret it one bit.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2016, 17:08
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is offline
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,655
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
On #25 vs. #35 chain, my advice is to avoid the former unless you are certain of your team's machining precision. As I mentioned, #35 chain is already more sensitive to mis-aligned sprockets than belts - but #25 chain is *far* more sensitive than #35 chain, still. If you cannot align the sprockets extremely well, it will fail. My teams, which machine almost exclusively with a chopsaw and a drillpress, have abandoned #25 chain for this reason, and we do not regret it one bit.
+1. #25 has only worked well for us when alignment was due to COTS parts, rather than our own machining. Then again, I wish we did more machining with a chop saw and a drill press; I am fighting an uphill battle against the hand drill and the Dremel tool.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
Reply With Quote
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-08-2016, 13:01
S1LK0124's Avatar
S1LK0124 S1LK0124 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0234 (Cyber Blue)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 36
S1LK0124 will become famous soon enough
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

I know for a fact that my team has published a paper evaluation this very topic. If you'd like, I can post a link to it!
Reply With Quote
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-08-2016, 13:03
S1LK0124's Avatar
S1LK0124 S1LK0124 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0234 (Cyber Blue)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 36
S1LK0124 will become famous soon enough
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

You can find it here, scroll down until you find the "Belts vs Chains presentation" PDF.
Reply With Quote
  #75   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-08-2016, 00:27
C.Lesco's Avatar
C.Lesco C.Lesco is offline
Engineering Captain, Driver
FRC #5870 (League of Logic)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 98
C.Lesco will become famous soon enough
Re: Chain vs. Belts?!?

Chains suck if you dont know how to instal them or get that finicky half link in however used correctly i think its fine. As for belts, a good belt is better in my opinion "but belts might stretch" people argue. Youre using the thing for 6 hours flat out total at most, it doesnt matter in the time span of build and comp unless youre using a multiyear old belt. BELLLTSSSS
__________________


Rookie Allstar winner North Bay regional 2016 [Team 5870]

Driver 2015 [Team 4814]
Lead Driver 2016 [Team 5870]
Build, Design and Engineering Captain 2016 [Team 5870]
Mentor 2017 [Team 5870]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:40.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi