|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
As for penalties we are discussing this internally. We think we are going to disallow it under the honor system that teams do not communicate ideas. Teaching from a non team member is one thing but competitors should be separated as to keep the playing field somewhat level. Hope this helps. If you have any questions feel free to ask. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Hey sorry for the delay but here is the game hint.
#smitihatesbears If you figured out the game in anyway keep it to yourself for now. But, congrats. See everyone later this week for the full unveiling. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
I'd like to participate, but I'm not sure I'll have access to the only computer of mine that can do CAD. Also, I'm not currently a member of an FRC team, and I noticed that the sign up asks for a team number. Could I just put in "00000"(no team)? Or do I need to be on a team?
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
In my experience collaboration makes everybody involved better which is the great thing about all the Ri3D-esque groups. If the goal of F4 is to connect people, and your CADithon's goal is to help people become better at CAD it seems counter to both of these goals to restrict collaboration. Last edited by tickspe15 : 26-07-2016 at 20:58. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
Collaboration would also be unfair if not all teams collaborated. All in all I think its just better to keep everyone separate. However, there are teams of 2 people each. I am sure there will be plenty of collaboration between the 2 designers which is especially cool for the teams who do not already know each other. Last edited by Sperkowsky : 26-07-2016 at 21:11. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
F4 is hosting a competition here, there has to be separated teams. If the only goal was learning, then they would host a webinar or somesuch. honestly that's not a bad idea for the future: a collaborative robot for a made up game. I don't recall Ri3D collaborating too much. Besides, the goal of Ri3D is to help people learn, so making the same robot would be pointless. EDIT: On the topic of fairness, if 6 teams collaborate on strategy and design, they will probably have a better shot than a single team working alone. Last edited by asid61 : 26-07-2016 at 21:13. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
God forbid there be collaboration. We may see twins, triplets, or HUNDREDS of the same robots. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
Asids idea of a single collaborative robot with a ton of people for a game like ours would be cool and we will explore the possibility for a different event. Thanks for all your feedback. Lastly I do not know about you but I am not the biggest fan of duplicate robots. And.. if FIRST became more like VEX where a lot of people copied designs I would probably leave the program. Last edited by Sperkowsky : 26-07-2016 at 21:24. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
If this is practice for the real season and real life, wouldn't it be fantastic to teach them what actually goes on? Teach them that you learn the most from collaborating on ideas and making something great? No one can truly learn without collaboration. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
IIRC you said there will be a Slack channel for competitors. It seems to me this would be a PERFECT avenue for participants to gauge ideas, feasibility of design, and ask for help. I don't see how that would take away from anything here. Who cares if everyone comes out with similar robots- if they're all individually designed, does it not fulfill the goal of getting more exposure to CAD? Sending assemblies and full on collaboration/copying designs IS potentially detrimental to your goal, but communication and bouncing ideas off each other isn't. Last edited by bkahl : 26-07-2016 at 21:37. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
In terms of talking about feasibility about designs we think the Judges on the final day are much more suited to talk about that. If you have any more questions if we could talk within PM's it would be great. That way we can keep this thread more free for future announcements. Speaking of which. I probably should announce our third judge. Our final judge is Devin Castellucci (Robochair) from team 1678. Looks like we will have a very qualified judging panel and I am sure some very valuable design feedback will be received. Stay tuned for future announcements. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
All team members who have signed up so far have been invited to the Slack. We did have 1 bounced email so if you signed up before I posted this that is you. Please PM me and sort that out.
We also had 2 people sign up as teams without a second member. If that is you please try to get your second member to register. Its also worth mentioning registration closes tomorrow at midnight est. We have 10 full and complete teams which is above what we were expecting so that is awesome! The manual and field are pretty much done. We are editing and rendering now. Anyway we look forward to seeing everyone! Get on Slack ASAP as that is where we plan on announcing stuff. If you are not there then you do not get the announcements. Lets make this a great event! - Sam Last edited by Sperkowsky : 27-07-2016 at 21:06. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: F4 - CADathon 2016
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|