California District Proposal, Rev 2

[Isonine]

Originally Posted by R.C.

Probably should read the proposal above.

I have read the proposal, all I'm saying is that is what I was told by the NorCal director.

Originally Posted by Pauline Tasci

I would encourage you and anyone else to question bold numbers like that!
In this proposal we made it a point to break down how we got the numbers we did, I would encourage you to ask for the same explanation when people throw around numbers like 25-35 events.

If I talk to her again I will, all I'm saying is that was what I was told. I'm not providing any argument or analysis of that statement.

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

Ever is a strong world. Depending on how the whole brexit things shake out California is somewhere between the the 4th and 7th biggest economies.... Pretty sure we have the resources.

We also have somewhere around 500% of michigans population, 80% as many teams and currently 0% as many districts.

Yes, she did not say "ever", her tone was just that FIRST was not considering districts for California, as they already looked at it, found that it required too many resources, and then closed the case on it. Again, I'm not against the idea of districts, I'm just relaying what I have been told.

For anyone wondering, I was told this information at the San Mateo Maker Faire offseason event.