paper: Einstein History

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by SteveGarward

111 has won 3 championships, including 2003. Looks like the data from 2003 on TBA is... not quite right. The page on FIRST is not responding for me to check the source.

For 2003, both alliances are listed as finalists on TBA, and no winner. Should I switch that to both alliances as winners, or keep them this way?

[smitikshah]

Awesome work Mark! It's fun to pass the time looking at this data and analyzing for my own conclusions!

[Jake177]

Originally Posted by Hitchhiker 42

For 2003, both alliances are listed as finalists on TBA, and no winner. Should I switch that to both alliances as winners, or keep them this way?

If you look at the awards page, it shows the winning alliance (65, 469, 111) and the finalist alliance (25, 494, 343).
http://www.thebluealliance.com/event/2003cmp#awards

2003 is also missing the SF teams: 236, 341, 175, 378, 292, 302

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by Jake177

If you look at the awards page, it shows the winning alliance (65, 469, 111) and the finalist alliance (25, 494, 343).
http://www.thebluealliance.com/event/2003cmp#awards

2003 is also missing the SF teams: 236, 341, 175, 378, 292, 302

Ok, thank you. I'm adding that to my data set right now. In general, if anyone has any data that's missing from the spreadsheet, I'll be happy to take it and fill it in!

[Joe Ross]

You may be interested in comparing your data against this: https://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3263

[MARS_James]

Originally Posted by mipo0707

33 should have a win too with 233 and 2056

..... from when?

[mipo0707]

Originally Posted by MARS_James

..... from when?

No I mean like they all are long due to win worlds

[Lexlukener]

Another typo 4265 is from TN not MA

[smitikshah]

Originally Posted by Lexlukener

Another typo 4265 is from TN not MA

I don't know what you're talking about - that's what it says.

http://imgur.com/UFeJ667

[Hitchhiker 42]

Hey, so I just updated the spreadsheet a little, to make it more formula-based, so its easier to add next year's teams on Einstein (gonna have to think about how we're gonna stretch that 2 Einstein thing [just wondering, will they still be called Einstein?]) </end rant>.

Basically, you can just type in next year's teams in the left-most column, and press update teams button to update the lists.

[Paul Copioli]

Originally Posted by lynca

Great information. Sorting by appearances on Einstein.
233 and 2056 are due for a Win!

I don't know if it's Andrew's summary or the data, but 217 should have 7 appearances: 2001, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2016.

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by Paul Copioli

I don't know if it's Andrew's summary or the data, but 217 should have 7 appearances: 2001, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2016.

Just the summary; the full data sheet lists them as having 7 appearances.

[mipo0707]

Originally Posted by lynca

Great information. Sorting by appearances on Einstein.
233 and 2056 are due for a Win!

233 won't be able to win now but 33 3476 2056 4039 1986 195 125 all need to win some time soon

[Kpchem]

Originally Posted by mipo0707

233 won't be able to win now...

Maybe I've just missed something, but why won't 233 be able to win now?

[asid61]

Originally Posted by Kpchem

Maybe I've just missed something, but why won't 233 be able to win now?

This was their last year in FRC.