|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Best in your State/Region
Summer CD is boring, and these threads are less boring.
Who are the top 5 teams in your state/region:
I'll comment in a little bit with some data on NY, unless someone else wants to do it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Sweet thread that is indeed less boring than others!
Top 5 OPR in MN: 1) 5172, 73.85 at the Newton Division 2) 2052, 57.41 at the 10,000 Lakes Regional 3) 3130, 55.11 at the North Star Regional 4) 5434, 54.41 at the 10,000 Lakes Regional 5) 4009, 52.57 at the MN State Championship I'll post the rest of the top 5's later today. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
These are the lists for Minnesota
This year by OPR 5172 2052 3130 5434 4009 Based on this year's results at various levels 2220 2502 2052 5172 3130 This year overall 2052 5172 2502 3130 2220 Past 5 years by OPR 2052 3130 5172 2175 2502 Past 5 years by results at various levels 1816 2052 3130 2512 2175 Past 5 years overall 2052 3130 2175 2502 2512 In terms of culture 2169 5172 2175 2502 1816 It's pretty interesting how the lists have a lot of the same teams on them. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
2-5-4! 2-5-4! 2-5-4! 2-5-4!
Seriously though, for all my fanboying 1678 is starting to give them a run for their money in recent years. They have been on Einstein more often in the last 4 years, anyway. 971 has good years and bad years, but generally remain slightly behind 1678. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
I would say 3419. Their robot for the past two years has been solid.
Plus, they pioneered the camera pole. Who could complain? ![]() Also, 1796 always makes an incredible showing. Their robot this year was killer. Last edited by ollien : 22-08-2016 at 13:15. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
I'd post some for our little happy tribe of Kansas teams, but thankfully, someone on 1108 went ahead and did it for me. I can now officially say that I'm #4 in the state (by RP), which is a great marketing stat.
Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...sb6Q9C1glyogac |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
In Northern California: 1678, 254, and 971. All are absolutely fantastic teams with 4 Championships, multiple division wins and dozens of regional victories between them. They are all incredibly helpful and nice, and do whatever they can to help other teams.
For culture and other awards in NorCal 1868 is pretty hard to beat, having won Chairman's 5 times in their existence and many other awards. Also, if anyone is interested I wrote a post about 1678's rise from an OK team to absolute domination. Here's the link: https://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/s...89&postcount=9 Last edited by frcguy : 22-08-2016 at 18:03. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Here's some OPR stats for California. It's crazy just how dominant 254 has been (and makes me wonder: is this normal in other regions too?)
2016, max OPR: 254 - 78.9 at SVR 971 - 77.1 at Sac 1678 - 70.5 on Hopper 3309 - 62.9 at Orange County 330 - 60.0 at Ventura 2016, avg OPR: 971 - 72.0 254 - 69.4 1678 - 61.7 330 - 57.3 973 - 52.2 Avg rank by max OPR, past 5 years: 254 - 1.4 (2, 2, 1, 1, 1) 1717 - 5.3 (1, 3, 8, 9, )971 - 5.4 (7, 10, 6, 2, 2) 1678 - 6.8 (9, 16, 3, 3, 3) 973 - 7.6 (3, 5, 13, 11, 6) Avg rank by avg OPR, past 5 years: 254 - 1.6 (2, 2, 1, 1, 2) 971 - 5 (7, 8, 5, 4, 1) 1678 - 5 (6, 11, 3, 2, 3) 1717 - 6.25 (1, 3, 7, 14, )1538 - 7 (12, 1, 9, 6, 7) Misc notes: - Of those 6 teams, 4 are previous world champions. 1538 and 1717 have made division finals at least once each. 254 and 1538 are also HOF teams - Of the past 5 years, only this year (2016) had a different teams holding the top max OPR and top average OPR record - Of the past 5 years, the top 3 teams for both max and avg OPR appear in the top 10 teams across all 5 years with one exception: 2485 ranked 2nd in both categories in 2014 but ranked 12th in max / 21st in avg - I used the OPR data from 2834's database, which includes OPRs from divisions but not Einstein - I excluded 2 2016 rookie teams from the top 10 avg OPR rankings (5924 at 9th, and 5818 at 11th) since I figured there wouldn't be much of a trend to see, pushing 3309 (at 12th) in - There are a lot of teams with black as their team color, so my color coordination for the plots got a bit messed up (sorry 1671 and 3309) Plots of the top 10 teams by average max/avg OPR rank over the past 5 years: We're honored by the mention, but 604 definitely takes the top spot for Chairman's (excluding HOF teams). I don't have award data easily accessible but I'd guess 1671, 1323, and 3256 would be strong norcal contenders, as would 2485 and 3476 for socal. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Where can one find OPR data?
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Best in NY in 2016:
By Average OPR:
In my opinion, Overall:
Best in NY the past 5 years: By OPR:
*5254 has only been around for 3 of the 5 years in question. By Championship Results:
Culture:
Last edited by Kevin Leonard : 23-08-2016 at 02:01. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Here they are!
By Championship Results/Performance: 1) 2052, Division W 2) 2502, Division F 3) 5172, Division SF 4) 3130, Division SF 5) 4009, Division SF By Championship Selection Order for MN: 1) 5172, 3rd overall pick 2) 2823, 4th seed captain 3) 2052/3130 (tie), 4th overall pick 4) 2987, 8th seed captain 5) 4607, 9th overall By Championship Rank: 1) 2823, ranked 4th 2) 2052, ranked 8th 3) 3130, ranked 9th 4) 5172, ranked 10th 5) 2987, ranked 11th By Regional Robot Results: 1) 5172, Regional F and W 2) 2052, Regional F and W 3) 4009, Regional W and SF 4) 2502, Regional W and SF 5) 2883/3130, Regional QF and W/Regional W and QF By Regional/Championship Award Result: 1) 2220, 2 judged awards at champs, 2 judged awards at regional, WFFA, and chairman's 2) 2052, 1 judged award at regional and chairman's 3) 4607, WFFA and chairman's 4) 2502, 2 Engineering Inspiration awards 5) 4009, 1 Engineering Inspiration award IMO, overall for 2016 (not soley based on robots): 1) 2220 2) 5172 3) 2052 4) 4607 5) 2502 Past 5 years on OPR: 1) 2169 2) 5172 3) 2052 4) 2175 5) 3130 Past 5 years championship results: 1) 2052, 1 Division W and 3 Division QF's 2) 2169, 1 Division F, 1 Division SF, 1 Division QF 3) 2512, 1 Division W and 1 Division QF 4) 2175/2502, 1 Division F and 1 Division QF 5) 3130, 2 Division SF's Past 5 years regional robot results: 1) 2052, 5 Regional W's, 4 Regional F's, 1 Regional SF 2) 2502, 3 Regional W's, 1 Regional F, 5 Regional SF 3) 3130, 3 Regional W's, 1 Regional F, 1 Regional SF, 4 Regional QF's 4) 2169, 3 Regional W's, 1 Regional F, 1 Regional SF, 4 Regional QF's 5) 2175, 3 Regional W's, 1 Regional SF, 5 Regional QF's Past 5 years regional award results: 1) 1816, 3 Chairman's and 2 EI's 2) 2220, 2 Chairman's and 2 EI's 3) 2169, 2 Chairman's and 1 EI 4) 3630, 1 Chairman's and 1 EI 5) 2052/2526/4607 (3 way tie), 1 Chairman's IMO, Past 5 years overall: 1) 1816 2) 2220 3) 2052 4) 2169 5) 2512 Last edited by jajabinx124 : 23-08-2016 at 17:30. Reason: 2987 flew under my radar |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Quote:
Seriously, though, I was playing around with using the t-distribution* to predict matches and/or order sort teams so as to make for faster picklisting so it's far more convenient for me to talk about MAR using T-scores to back me up. T-scores from MAR Champs based off of Dawgma's scouting data gives me, For teleop high goals: 1) 341, t = 3.6810 2) 225, t = 2.9516 3) 3314, t = 2.9507 4) 869, t = 2.7825 5) 5895, t = 2.3754 For teleop low goals: 1) 25, t = 7.6629 (they destroyed) 2) 1257, t = 4.6518 3) 708, t = 4.5852 4) 5113, t = 4.2006 5) 1923, t = 3.5787 For overall boulder volume: 1) 25, t = 6.3270 2) 708, t = 3.2628 3) 5895, t = 3.2018 4) 3314, t = 2.8022 5) 2590, t = 2.7175 Of course, I'm still playing around and this might change. Still working on stuff. * T, not Z, because n !>=30, so CLT for means won't apply. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best in your State/Region
Quote:
Not saying we should've been, but we were. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|