|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Optimal motor controllers?
First of all, thanks for paying this post any mind.
Secondly, I've been looking through the possible options for motor controllers for my team in the upcoming year, as we have been pretty outdated purely relying on Talon SRs and (for our backup) victor 888s. From what I've gathered, the two top contenders for the current motor controller are the Talon SRX/Victor SP and the SPARK, however I've also found that the SD540(B) also seems immensely useful as well as smaller than the SPARK, so what does your teams use? What do you suggest? Are the SD540Bs the only ones that come in banking models? Once again, thank you |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
I would highly recommend against the SD540B, and you can see the reasons why here: https://www.amazon.com/review/R1JCF3...toys-and-games
TL;DR: The case is 3D printed, feels like it's going to fall apart, the solder joints are pretty bad, and (not mentioned in that review) only seven teams used them this year. I'd recommend going for the SPARK unless you REALLY need the space or the CAN abilities. The CAN is nice, but unless you're really tight on wiring space or need those nice features, like built in PID control or more control over aspects of the motor controller through code, you don't need it. I made the mistake of thinking we did need these this year, and I wasted $40 and a free motor controller through the voucher. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Quote:
I think the Spark is great for a budget model, but I'm also a huge fan of the Talon SRX. They have a small form factor, and the ease of wiring just CAN is the main selling point for me. It's way easier to chain all of the controllers together with just one wire on each, rather than have half a dozen PWM wires going to your RoboRio. We used them this season and they were fantastic. TL;DR: SD540B is not very good, Spark is a good all-around inexpensive option, and the Talon SRX is awesome. Hope that helps! |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
I've used every legal motor controller from 2004 on, save for the SD540B. It's very hard to go wrong with any of the options on the market, so now your questions are:
1) Will you want CAN? If so, you want a Talon SRX. 2) Will you want higher-than-FRC voltages for other applications? If so, you want a Talon SR (if you can find one), Talon SRX, or certain antediluvian Victor 883s if you can find an old team's junk pile. The latter question was important to a recent project of mine--turns out an 18V drill motor makes a handy power source sometimes! ![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Note, black Jaguars could do up to 30V as well.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Accurate (PDF, page 4). (I think I shut the Jaguars out of my mind completely...but then, if you're digging in a junk pile, perhaps that's a good thing!)
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Quote:
The only thing that I do not like about the Spark is the large footprint, and the only thing I do not like about the Talon SRX is the price. For both the 2015 and 2016 seasons, we on Team 696 have been using the Victor SP; its a middle ground in some sense. You get the nice and small form factor with a bit lower price than the Talon SRX but, of course, you do not get CAN. We have been happy with the product for the past two years, and used PWM motor controllers for plenty of years before that, so there are no major complaints from us on the Victor SP. Only down side I could think of is the predetermined PWM cable length. In a perfect scenario, your motor controllers are not "that" far from the RoboRio, but I have seen teams have to make extension cables for their Victor SPs. I got excited when the OP said they used the Talon SR, I miss the days of getting to make PWM cables to whatever length you wanted. I would recommend the Spark, Victor SP, or Talon SRX. They are all great products, but with their pros and cons to each of course. Last edited by AlexanderLuke : 22-08-2016 at 23:13. Reason: Added clarification. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
If your using Talon SR’s are they are working well for you there isn’t necessarily a need to change (providing you have a decent stockpile that will last you a few more seasons).
The SPARK and the SD540B’s aresimilar to the Talon SR both in design and functionality if you need more controllers they could be a good option due to their low cost (SPARK is the better option of the two), but if you already have a lot of SR’s then moving to SPARK’s or SD540B’s may not be a necessary upgrade( unless you want features like the limit switch inputs on the SPARK etc.) In regards to the Victor SP vs Talon SRX, it really just depends on whether you want to move to CAN or want to continue using PWM. If you are planning to continue using PWM staying with your existing SR’s would probably be fine, if you want to make the move to CAN (it’s not difficult and has a lot of advantages) the Talon SRX is the only option that can be bought new off the shelf (at the moment). |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
I recommend either the Talon SRX or the Victor SP. They are particularly useful due to the mounting options available and their reliability. We mounted our four drive Talons in an out of the way location by bolting them to the frame and didn't have any issues.
As for which to get, start looking a few years down the line. Yes, CAN is more expensive but it does buy you a few things with feedback and wiring. Figure out which route you want to go and start purchasing those a few at a time. Also, remember you can run Talon SRXs over PWM, not just CAN. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Quote:
The really old 883s without the PWM shroud are 12V only. They'll work @ 24V for a very short time before going poof. The newer 883s with the PWM shroud are rated for 24V. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
For a basic PWM motor controller the "outdated" Talon SR is hard to beat. About the only down side is you cannot buy them new anymore.
Others have already commented on the current crop |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Lots of different constraints here. It's hard to go wrong between the Talons, Victors, and Sparks available. Even "outdated" controllers are pretty good and should be competitive.
Avoid Jaguars, if they are even still legal at this point. They don't have a great track record for reliability, and while later (black) Jaguars were better, there isn't much reason to use them over a Talon unless you desperately need to save money and they are donated to you from an old team. Victor SPs and Talon SRXes have both served my team (228) very well this past year. Basically you use a Talon anywhere you might want to implement PID speed or position control on the controller itself, and a Victor anywhere you don't need that functionality. The performance is similar; cost and functionality are the difference makers. Keep in mind a Talon can be used as a regular PWM controller if you prefer. Sparks are something I don't have direct experience, but my old team (2791) used them this year without any problems. The footprint is a little larger, but they are very inexpensive, robust, and they have some handy little features (limit switch input, the LED has a bunch of different pretty colors, some people prefer screw terminals, etc). The main downside is the larger footprint, which bugs some people. |
|
#13
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Optimal motor controllers?
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|