|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Master uP Initialization Routine
What's all of this:
tempA CON c_p3_x <<1 + c_p4_x <<1 + c_p1_x <<1 + c_p2_x <<1 + c_rc_swB dataInitA CON tempA <<1 + c_rc_swA <<1 + c_oi_swB <<1 + c_oi_swA tempB CON c_sensor4 <<1 + c_sensor3 <<1 + c_p1_y <<1 + c_p2_y <<1 + c_sensor2 dataInitB CON tempB <<1 + c_sensor1 <<1 + c_packet_num <<1 + c_PB_mode tempC CON c_batt_volt <<1 + c_sensor7 <<1 + c_p1_wheel <<1 + c_p2_wheel <<1 + c_sensor6 dataInitC CON tempC <<1 + c_sensor5 <<1 + c_p3_y <<1 + c_p4_y tempD CON c_res01 <<1 + c_delta_t <<1 + c_p3_aux <<1 + c_p4_aux <<1 + c_p1_aux dataInitD CON tempD <<1 + c_p2_aux <<1 + c_p3_wheel <<1 + c_p4_wheel Output COMA low COMA low COMB Wait_init: if IN3 = 1 then Wait_init: Shiftout COMB,COMA,1, [dataInitA,dataInitB,dataInitC,dataInitD,dataInitVo lt] Input COMA high COMB Does it actually effect the I/O processor? Let's say I keep all the c_constants 0... does it make a difference? Does it have an effect on the order of variables that the SERIN command takes? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| initialization program and speed controllers | rosebud | Programming | 15 | 05-10-2004 03:35 |
| Image Discuss: Stack Master | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 13 | 04-03-2003 21:47 |
| Team 1002: Master Strategy | Real Deal | Robot Showcase | 3 | 25-02-2003 08:48 |
| my master plan (mwahahahahaha) | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 23-06-2002 22:04 |
| Pre-Match/Post- Match Pit Routine | Mark_lyons | General Forum | 14 | 31-03-2002 15:19 |