|
|
|
 I love the dedication of Robotics kids. :) - Danielle H [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What PPR (CPR * 4) do you use? | |||
| 1-127 |
  
|
2 | 6.45% |
| 128-255 |
  
|
3 | 9.68% |
| 256-511 |
  
|
8 | 25.81% |
| 512-1023 |
  
|
2 | 6.45% |
| 1024-2047 |
  
|
7 | 22.58% |
| 2048-8191 |
  
|
6 | 19.35% |
| 8192+ |
|
1 | 3.23% |
| None, we're too cool for encoders. |
|
2 | 6.45% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
How much PPR do you use on your encoders?
Just wondering what accuracy people look for in incremental encoders.
I'm using the USDigital method of PPR vs. CPR; CPR is Cycles Per Revolution and is 4x smaller than PPR (pulses per revolution). Option 8 also applies if you use potentiometers or absolute encoders in the place of incremental ones. A post below if you're one of those teams would be appreciated. Last edited by asid61 : 06-09-2016 at 13:38. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode