Go to Post I wouldn't want to force another me on everyone! - Andy Grady [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-04-2003, 13:25
Andrew Andrew is offline
Registered User
#0356
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 393
Andrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to all
We have used planetary drives for 2001, 2002. Mainly to show off machining ability and for compactness/weight reduction.

However, planetary, worm&gear, bevel gears, and the helical gears in the kit this year, have reduced efficiency for a given gear ratio than the good, old fashioned, easy to fabricate spur gear train. I forgot sprocket and chain, but that's less efficient as well.

Given the limitations on current (due to fuses) and the motor size, gear box mechanical efficiency may be the most important consideration in drive system design.

The energy per motor limitation is the other reason why you want to get four motors into your drive system somehow. If you try to go up to six motors, you may discover that you have put too much weight and resources into your drive system and you cannot do anything else. But, I haven't got any experience with that.

One advantage to being a torquier bot than a speedier bot is that you end up drawing less available energy out of the battery per match. Secondly, with a crowded field, such as FIRST has provided for the past few years, acceleration is more important than speed. Pushing power is far more important than speed.

We have been bracketing the "ideal" FIRST gear ratio. We started with a 15 fps bot, which was hard to control and couldn't run very long on one battery, to a 4 fps bot which runs forever on one battery. We also have a 6 fps bot with an inefficient drive system. This guy is better than the 15 fps bot at battery life but can only handle about 15 minutes of hard driving before you can smell the motors.

This year's bot was a 4.1 fps with four drive motors. I think we can go as high as 5 fps with the four motor version. We had no trouble with motor heating, battery drain, motor damage, etc.

I actually took a page from Wild Stang's 2001 robot (which they were gracious enough to show me) for our gear boxes this year. So, thanks for the tip!
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much planning goes into your robot? Jnadke General Forum 41 29-01-2006 21:29
What? Isnt everyone building new functions on their robot?? archiver 2001 4 24-06-2002 01:34
Righting a robot... archiver 2001 2 24-06-2002 00:26
WASH Palm scouting at the Championship Mike Soukup Scouting 2 19-04-2002 15:14
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi