|
Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron
Removing SBD will put undue pressure on teams who do not currently work past SBD. If it is removed, then (because "everyone else works up until competition") they will feel like they need to work up until competition in order to keep up.
|
I'm having a tough time with this logic. If the teams who do not work past SBD are ok not working in the current system, where they can utilize withholding, unbags, or building additional robots - how does removing the stop bag put more pressure on them? Theyre already making a choice to not work on the robot through these avenues...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron
Removing SBD will mean less work for teams that build a second robot (they can focus their efforts on one robot if they want), but more work on lower resource teams who only build one robot.
|
On your second point in red, think about it this way. If these teams already build two robots, they already have access to all the 'awesomeness' that comes from not working around a bag. Opening the rules makes this activity simply less wasteful. The teams that build just one robot would have to work less hard to achieve the same level of on-field performance than they currently do.
It's almost as if you're saying teams who WANT to have access to their robot outside of a bag (teams who build two robots) should have a handicap (build a second robot) so the rest of the competition who is content with their current performance doesn't have to feel bad about not working as hard.
-Brando
__________________
MORT (Team 11) '01-'05 :
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winners
-2013 MORT Hall of Fame Inductee
NUTRONs (Team 125) '05-???
2007 Boston Regional Winners
2008 & 2009 Boston Regional Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
2010 Boston Regional Creativity Award
2011 Bayou Regional Finalists, Innovation in Control Award, Boston Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award
2012 New York City Regional Winners, Boston Regional Finalists, IRI Mentor of the Year
2013 Orlando Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award, Boston Regional Winners, Pine Tree Regional Finalists
2014 Rhode Island District Winners, Excellence in Engineering Award, Northeastern University District Winners, Industrial Design Award, Pine Tree District Chairman's Award, Pine Tree District Winners
2015 South Florida Regional Chairman's Award, NU District Winners, NEDCMP Industrial Design Award, Hopper Division Finalists, Hopper/Newton Gracious Professionalism Award
|