Go to Post Really heavy snow is different in Minnasota and Oklahoma... It has to be pretty bad up there. - thatoneguy23 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2016, 01:02
ollien ollien is offline
Registered User
FRC #5202
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 275
ollien has a spectacular aura aboutollien has a spectacular aura aboutollien has a spectacular aura about
Re: Motorizied flow control

Quote:
Originally Posted by mman1506 View Post
We had a team pass with something similar at Waterloo, the LRI and I couldn't find anything illegal about it. As long as the pneumatic fitting remain unmodified It should be fine. I would still consult the Q&A as the ruling of inspectors could vary and It could potentially save some time during inspection.
Dare I ask what this was for?
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2016, 01:29
mman1506's Avatar
mman1506 mman1506 is offline
Focusing on Combat Robots!
AKA: Marcus Quintilian
no team (WARP7)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 739
mman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motorizied flow control

Quote:
Originally Posted by ollien View Post
Dare I ask what this was for?
The team wanted to have a 3rd position for their air cylinder. I think the plan was to actuate the cylinder with the solenoid and use the servo to let out air until it was the right height. I don't think they ever got it functioning.
__________________
2014-2015: FRC 865 Warp7 Team Captain
2016: FRC 865 Mentor
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2016, 22:38
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 831
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Motorizied flow control

As already mentioned the problem with your system is not the flow controls, but the 3-position valve.The question of using a 3-position valve to achieve intermediate cylinder positions has come up many times. If the center valve position is both-ports-closed, this technique is illegal because it creates closed, pressurized lines that are not vented when the system is vented. If the center valve position is both-ports-exhausted, this should be legal, but would have no ability to hold its position on its own.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2016, 10:44
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is online now
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,884
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motorizied flow control

It is a little Rube Golbergish, but there is a way to make a closed center 3 position valve legal under 2016 rules. You use check valves to allow both sides of the cylinder to flow back the working pressure side of the system. They won't do anything when the system is pressurized, but they will vent the cylinder when the system is depressurized.
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-09-2016, 12:43
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is online now
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,884
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Motorizied flow control

Attached is a sketch on how to use check valves to make using a closed center 3 position valve legal under FRC rules (at least for 2016)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf CYLINFER VENT.pdf (33.8 KB, 40 views)
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-09-2016, 13:21
Levi Madden's Avatar
Levi Madden Levi Madden is offline
Student
FRC #1987
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Missouri
Posts: 31
Levi Madden is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Motorizied flow control

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
Attached is a sketch on how to use check valves to make using a closed center 3 position valve legal under FRC rules (at least for 2016)
It is important to note that you connect the check valve to your working pressure, not your stored.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-09-2016, 14:09
nuclearnerd's Avatar
nuclearnerd nuclearnerd is offline
Speaking for myself, not my team
AKA: Brendan Simons
FRC #5406 (Celt-X)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 439
nuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud ofnuclearnerd has much to be proud of
Re: Motorizied flow control

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
Attached is a sketch on how to use check valves to make using a closed center 3 position valve legal under FRC rules (at least for 2016)
Oh very cool, thanks! With a setup like that you could create a pneumatic position control system (like http://www.bimba.com/Products-and-Ca...ntrol-System/). Add a pneumatic rod lock (http://www.bimba.com/Products-and-Ca...Line-Rod-Lock/) and you could move and hold actuators with very few mechanics.

The downside is the limited compressor size means you wouldn't be able to move a cylinder bigger than ~1" more than a few cycles a match.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi