|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
The team wanted to have a 3rd position for their air cylinder. I think the plan was to actuate the cylinder with the solenoid and use the servo to let out air until it was the right height. I don't think they ever got it functioning.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
As already mentioned the problem with your system is not the flow controls, but the 3-position valve.The question of using a 3-position valve to achieve intermediate cylinder positions has come up many times. If the center valve position is both-ports-closed, this technique is illegal because it creates closed, pressurized lines that are not vented when the system is vented. If the center valve position is both-ports-exhausted, this should be legal, but would have no ability to hold its position on its own.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
It is a little Rube Golbergish, but there is a way to make a closed center 3 position valve legal under 2016 rules. You use check valves to allow both sides of the cylinder to flow back the working pressure side of the system. They won't do anything when the system is pressurized, but they will vent the cylinder when the system is depressurized.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Attached is a sketch on how to use check valves to make using a closed center 3 position valve legal under FRC rules (at least for 2016)
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
It is important to note that you connect the check valve to your working pressure, not your stored.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Motorizied flow control
Quote:
The downside is the limited compressor size means you wouldn't be able to move a cylinder bigger than ~1" more than a few cycles a match. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|