Go to Post While grandmothers are pretty cool, I would be hesitant in letting them determine what is and is not a robot. - Kellen Hill [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-10-2016, 05:28
cbale2000's Avatar
cbale2000 cbale2000 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Bale
FRC #0703 (Phoenix)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 919
cbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: High Traction Drivetrain Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osseus_Dominum View Post
In my experience, these sort of drivetrains are susceptible to massive friction loss in a pushing match due to the effects of front-end lifting. For a visible (though somewhat extreme) example of this effect, check out videos from the 2010 game, where bumpers were mounted high.

To reference Lil' Lavery's comments above, in a drive system like this, the weight is distributed evenly between the wheels, however, when you get into a pushing match with another robot (assuming bumpers are the same height), both robots have a tendency to push each other upwards when in any kind of pushing match. On an 8wd robot where the center wheels are lower than the outer ones, the robot simply tilts back onto the rear wheels and maintains traction, but for a no-drop drive system, this effect will result in all of the robot weight being shifted on to you rear wheels, which in this case, have the lowest friction. All other things being equal, this design will likely not stand up in a pushing match with the majority of drop-center 8+ wheel robots, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-10-2016, 00:40
carpedav000's Avatar
carpedav000 carpedav000 is offline
Studenting is hard, but worth it!
AKA: David Carpenter
no team (Jerry-Rigg school of DuctTapeology)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 443
carpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant future
Re: pic: High Traction Drivetrain Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbale2000 View Post
On an 8wd robot where the center wheels are lower than the outer ones, the robot simply tilts back onto the rear wheels and maintains traction, but for a no-drop drive system, this effect will result in all of the robot weight being shifted on to you rear wheels, which in this case, have the lowest friction. All other things being equal, this design will likely not stand up in a pushing match with the majority of drop-center 8+ wheel robots, IMO.
It seems like this issue could be easily remedied by mounting your drive motors/gearboxes (and battery if you have room) to the front of the robot to make it less resistant to shifting onto the back wheels. You could also build a suspension system into the wheels so that when the frame tilts, all the wheels stay on the ground (some might say that this would be too heavy, but you can make suspension systems fairly light ).
__________________
It isn't shiny enough.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-10-2016, 22:07
cbale2000's Avatar
cbale2000 cbale2000 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Bale
FRC #0703 (Phoenix)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 919
cbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: High Traction Drivetrain Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by carpedav000 View Post
It seems like this issue could be easily remedied by mounting your drive motors/gearboxes (and battery if you have room) to the front of the robot to make it less resistant to shifting onto the back wheels. You could also build a suspension system into the wheels so that when the frame tilts, all the wheels stay on the ground (some might say that this would be too heavy, but you can make suspension systems fairly light ).
The weight solution is a good one for pushing matches, but it affects turning in most drives and only works in one direction (often I've found you need to be able to push from either side).
The suspension is also a good solution but far more complex to build.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-10-2016, 05:54
carpedav000's Avatar
carpedav000 carpedav000 is offline
Studenting is hard, but worth it!
AKA: David Carpenter
no team (Jerry-Rigg school of DuctTapeology)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 443
carpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant future
Re: pic: High Traction Drivetrain Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbale2000 View Post
The weight solution is a good one for pushing matches, but it affects turning in most drives and only works in one direction (often I've found you need to be able to push from either side).
The suspension is also a good solution but far more complex to build.
I'm working on fixing the complexity part
__________________
It isn't shiny enough.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi