Go to Post I also hate it when I keep seeing this message: "You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Andy Baker again." - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2016, 21:39
ratdude747's Avatar
ratdude747 ratdude747 is offline
Official Scorekeeper
AKA: Larry Bolan
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,061
ratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Utilizing breaks between matches.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceBiz View Post
So If Chris is right and it only takes one extra volunteer per event to do something like he is talking about, can some of the people who think it is not worth changing the current event cycle explain why?

I know making more software is not really easy, but if having this extra announcing is only optional for event organizers, what are some other disadvantages this? I don't see how more noise over the speaker for an extra minute can make scouting harder, because scouts can just ignore it.
I can think of a few things:

-Liabilities: Having such a table would be one more person to accidentally say something that would not be in the best interests of FIRST. A hot mic is a powerful tool that can be abused. Not to say such would be likely but I could foresee a well intended comment offending a team or coming off the wrong way, and while most would laugh it off, it could be seen as a risk.

-Perceived bias: This is sorta the same thing as above, but I'll mention it anyway. I could see a team not doing so well not get as much mention in said commentary, and then try to claim that the commentator was "biased" and deliberately didn't give them much mention. If said team nearly missed playoffs (or got picked somewhat low), now they could try to claim discrimination. While such probably wouldn't work as a civil suit, it could become a PR nightmare, and most organizations wish to avoid the risk of such.

-Nothing to say: Let's be honest, many events (and even some fields at champs) don't have all good matches with positive commentary to be made. IRI/Einstein playoffs are never dull, which is IMHO why such commentary tables work there. But some early-week events... *crickets chirping*.

I do think that commentary tables at regionals/districts have potential as an idea, but I don't think it will be a slam dunk like IRI live has been. I don't mention these things because I think it's a bad idea, but because realistically there may be some roadblocks to getting such implemented in an official event.
__________________
Dean's List Semi-finalist 2010
1747 Harrison Boiler Robotics 2008-2010, 2783 Engineers of Tomorrow 2011, Event Volunteer 2012-current

DISCLAIMER: Any opinions/comments posted are solely my personal opinion and does not reflect the views/opinions of FIRST, IndianaFIRST, or any other organization.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:10.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi