|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Should we use std::unique_ptr?
Yes WPIlib is moving to using more of the standard library pointer wrappers. I like using them because it makes it way easier to manage the code. Also you don't have to cast to a subsystem pointer. We do
Requires(Robot::drivebaseSubsystem.get()); And it works fine for us. I doubt that they will overload the functions to accept both. The whole reason they switched was to make it easier for teams to debug. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|