|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it gracious professional behavoir to score points for an opposing alliance to incr | |||
| This would be considered gracious professional behavior |
|
6 | 40.00% |
| This would be considered not gracious professional behavior |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| It is neither gracious nor ungracious professional behavior |
|
6 | 40.00% |
| There are mitigating factors that may make this gracious or ungracious professional behavior |
|
2 | 13.33% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Scoring points for the opposing alliance
With only 5 matches in qualification at most FTC events, the RPs become really important. At our event last weekend there were four teams who were 5-0 (and other teams who could have been 5-0 if not for the luck of the draw). There were active conversations before qualifying match alliances between partners about how to maximize RPs. I know beacons were given up, but I don't know of any particles scored in opposing alliance goals or beacons intentionally switched to the wrong color.
I personally don't like RPs as a tiebreaker and would prefer something else, but until it changes then this strange behaviour is an acceptable part of the game encouraged by the way the rules are written. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|