|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
I asked for you opinion of the changes I proposed Not for a 40 post discussion of what GP means. The main focus prupose of the thread has been perverted and I have been verbaly made fun of by old women and some people who cant formulate ideas with facts to back them up. I want this thread deleted because where it has gone is petty bickering over vocab. Alsmot as if wer were arguing over religion. The forums are not the time or the place. If you want to openly ARGUE vocab then PM me i dont want to resort to that here. Until the last few post I have stayed calm consice and I have backed up all my thoughts with valid reasons. I have nothing to be ashamed of.
|
|
#47
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
You may have nothing to be ashamed of, but neither do we who've argued against your points.
Like I said, we gave you our opinions. They just weren't what you wanted to hear.... Aaron Knight Webmaster and Videographer Team 891: Neverending Chaos... Your Lucky Number: 3.141592653589793238964... |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
You didnt use valid points are and facts to "argue against my posts' all you said was "GP" GP does not mean that the robots cant have a 24 volt system or better motors in the kit or a more developed ruleset that takes all manufacturer specs into account. All i said in regards to battlebots was that FIRST can learn from the limit comercial sucsess of battlebots and Apply some of what they did to make FIRST better. IE dont DQ a team because they nudge a robot and it falls over (ask 121) FIRST + Experience from more comercial robot competitions = Uber allpowerful mighty education GP great loved program.
My original posts were just thoughts I had on improving the FIRST program. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
ADMIN: Please Close
Let's put an end to the malitious amaturism displayed by all members in this thread and have an admin close it or remove it.
Last edited by sanddrag : 17-04-2003 at 20:49. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you
|
|
#51
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Obviously neither of the sides are going to change the other's side's mind. So, if you please just agree to disagree, and continue the conversation else where.
There is no room in this board for bashing of each other, and calling people names, which by the way, was very uncalled for. If you don't wish understand other's views, that is fine as long as you don't go all out and tell them they are wrong and that they have to believe something else. Let us know your opinion, back it up with reasons and evidence, then let the other side do the same thing, then take your time to read all the threads, spend time understanding the other's point of view, and have a meaningful discussion instead of all these yelling at each other. That is, afterall, the reason why we come to these board, no? I don't believe this thread should be deleted neither, because a lot of post have been well thought, and demonstrate a lot of good arguments. If you fail to see that, just don't visit this thread again. Mean while, others are going to come back in here, and learn a little about themselves and others as well. This thread can be turned into a very interesting discussion, if you want it to. But obviously that's not what you want, so rather than making all these argument worst, I am just going to say again, "Agree to disagree", and you can yell at each other by e-mail. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How my team see me in here (Re: I need your opinion, please | archiver | 2001 | 6 | 24-06-2002 04:19 |
| Voice your opinion here | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 02:20 |
| So..What's Everybody's Initial Opinion? | archiver | 1999 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:21 |
| controversial opinion? | archiver | 1999 | 11 | 23-06-2002 23:15 |
| need a general opinion from all you experts... | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:09 |