|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: PCH 2017
Quote:
Quote:
Obviously, there are the basics of why a team isn't as successful as it wants to be: 1. Money 2. Mentors 3. Resources 4. Support (Community & School) However, as you've said, there are teams that have plenty of all 5 and yet, we're still having this discussion. So obviously there are components that are subtle in nature but very important to the secret sauce of what makes a team truly great. I think one of the more subtle components is ensuring that your team has a culture of competition. Now, PCH has some very competitive teams, but having a competitive culture goes above and beyond simply wanting to win. A team with competitive culture... ...recognizes competition as an asset, not as a hindrance. ...recognizes that no matter how good you are, there's always room to improve. ...recognizes that failure is a part of the process, but it's not an acceptable outcome. A solid example of good competitive culture is team 1746. They started off strong, but continued to improve through the season and even carried that progress into the off-season. Many teams, including top-tier teams, would've rested on their laurels, but Otto sought to keep competing, and that's why their stock is incredibly high right now. But that's just one example; there are many other teams in PCH that definitely seem to have a flash of good competitive culture here and there. However, at the intersection of all the hard resources, competitive culture, and just pure, raw execution, we're going to get our first national competitor. - Sunny G. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|