|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
The split announcement in 2015 came right around the height of competition season between weeks 6 and 7. The split designations, if I recall correctly, came in right before 2016 Champs. Now, the announcement about a new, additional event is coming right before 2017 kickoff. Sooner or later it comes off as less coincidental and more overt. It's PR 101; take out the trash and dump news you don't like at a time where it's opportune for the constituency to forget about it (S1E13 of The West Wing uses this in its title). I don't necessarily blame them for trying to sate the inmates of this asylum, but in the famous words: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me Twice.... Won't get fooled again. I expect some key questions to be answered and I hope solutions to some legitimate issues are developed for the good of the program, but don't let the Chicken Littles of this thread allow some key, legitimate concerns to be ignored. |
|
#77
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
Overall, regardless of what it is called. The community will consider this the crowning of a champion and I would support such an assertion. |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
|
|
#79
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Reserving judgement for a moment, I'm curious as to how they'll handle the fact that this is 3 months after the two Championships. Do they allow teams to continue making robot changes, potentially having final matches with completely different robots? Or are the robots to be kept in bags (nevermind that this would suck, plus the teams would just use practise bots at home).
It reminds me a bit of college football, where teams are used to playing every week (with an occasional bye week), then for the bowl games they have a full month to prepare for one opponent. The better coached, better prepared team tends to win (in the regular season, talent plays a bigger role). If anything, this is more extreme. Anyhow, that's just my 2 cents. Although I get how some people would be mollified by this, it doesn't make me any happier. My problem with 2Champs was never the part where we don't have a world champion alliance crowned. It was the part where half the championship teams go to one place, and the other half goes to a different place (which obviously isn't going to be solved). |
|
#80
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
Known unknown issues: Handling of robots post-2Champs (bag 'em, "confiscate" 'em, or unrestricted use of 'em), transport of teams and/or robots to NH (particularly if international), alternates if 1+ teams can't make it, and the whole "3-month gap". What I think FIRST failed to see in the first place is that bringing more teams to the "Championship Experience" is not the same as bringing the "Championship Experience" to more teams... And that like it or not, the vehicle they chose to use for culture change is a COMPETITION and there was no clear winner (which clear winner you'd expect to see from a COMPETITION). Their failure to properly account for that is what is essentially forcing them to deal with a method for finding a single clear winner, and THAT is causing some interesting discussion. That being said, it will be very interesting to see which route they go for the Festival. If properly hyped up, and teams participate like they mean it, it could do wonders for promotion of FIRST (and STEM). But if something goes wrong--the brighter the spotlight, the easier it is to fail--including if one or more teams declines to attend and no replacement is found, then what you end up with is a big mess. |
|
#81
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
So anyway, what do you call the field upon which the champions compete? Zwei Steine?
|
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
The Einstein-Rosen Field of course!
|
|
#83
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
But maybe Brahe (Tycho Brahe) would work better. |
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
As someone who is not affiliated with an FRC team this year, much less one of the select few that one might guess at having a high chance at going to this event, I can't wait. Might grab some friends to watch the matches and reminisce.
Lots of details still up in the air but I can't imagine what a fantastic experience it will be for the students on those teams that will be in attendance. Especially for those third picks that might not necessarily be perennial powerhouses. Last edited by cadandcookies : 05-01-2017 at 01:25. Reason: Fourth robot or third pick, choose one. |
|
#85
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
I don't take offense to the notion that this is a solution to no actual overall winning alliance, I just think it's disingenuous for Jon to suggest people are being pedantic and that this is the same as what we'd have if we got the original super regional-champs progression FIRST put forward years ago. I would personally not consider this crowning a true champion. For me that definition would require something like all Einstein teams (ideally division finalists too) from each half champs meeting and playing quals/elims to determine a champion. Realistically that's not going to happen and it's kind of awkward to in effect have two super regionals that are called "Championships" and marketed as being no different than they were before and then both the winners (and some losers) progress to another event that's actually the real championship where you end up with different World Champions than were champions at their respective "Championships". That being said I'm certainly more excited about this, even with whatever flaws it may have, than just having 2 half champs winning alliances and ending there. |
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
This is a tough crowd.
I, for one, think it's awesome. I was very glad to read the announcement. |
|
#87
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
![]() |
|
#88
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Would it be CD if it was any different?
Last edited by Koko Ed : 05-01-2017 at 04:50. |
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Can't say I'm surprised at the amount of salt on this thread, just another day on Chief Drama.
With #2Champs being a solidified thing, this Festival sounds like a step in the right direction. Perfect solution? Maybe not, but it's not an event I can roast like the Thanksgiving turkey before it has even happened. Can't argue with how it might interfere with teams' IRI plans though. Interested to see what other details will be released in the upcoming months. Also happy to see an event of this scale take place here in NH. Home of HQ, Manchester really hasn't had anything to attract FIRSTers from other areas since GSR stopped. Stay positive folks, we have a whole season to get through first. |
|
#90
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FIRST Festival of Champions
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|