Quote:
Originally Posted by Aren_Hill
Just out of curiosity, why didn't you full constrain the CIM pilot nub? Your Center-Center on that gear mesh is now set by screw hole tolerances, for no benefit I can see.
Just curious, looks nifty.
-Aren
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbrowncny
The base extrude sketch for the mounting plate locates the CIM nub. That includes the +0.003 PD increase for gear mesh. That sketch is built off tangent circles inline. That sketch locates the center for the bearing holes, idler gear, and CIM nub. There is a +0.005 for CIM mounting (it takes into account powder coating). The second extrude cut on the main CIM mounting plate locates the CIM mounting holes at a 2in C-C off of the nub location.
Is there a better way to do this? I am self taught at Solidworks and I may not know the most efficient way to do something, but I can definitely manage sketches, circles and lines!  We are always trying to improve, comments welcome
|
I think what Aren was saying is when the gearbox is actually assembled, the only things keeping the CIMs from moving away from the center are the two screws per CIM. The tolerances on the cocentricity of the screws' bolt circle and the output shaft is not as high as that of the .75" boss around the output shaft. You already have half of the boss surrounded, so it should not be very hard to extend that all the way around the boss. Then the CIM boss will constrain it, instead of the screws. It will also help keep the CIM from wiggling when changing directions, which changes gear spacing and can ruin an otherwise good gearbox.
Aren please correct me if I'm misinterpreting you.