Go to Post We might not be as good as 217, or the other traditional "powerhouse" teams... but we are better because of them. Jason - dtengineering [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:29
sqwash984 sqwash984 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josef Griesmer
FRC #5431 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Plano
Posts: 7
sqwash984 is an unknown quantity at this point
Balls in a Cube

So while working our team came upon a interesting problem. Stacking balls with in a volume and calculating this number, is alot harder than making a cube out of a ball and filling the volume, or just dividing volumes. I did a little research on keplers sphere packaging problem and found that the most efficient way to stack them is about 74% of their volume or if randomly places about 65% of their volume. Going by these numbers, assuming our robot is a storage containers 36x24x40 I can hold 390 balls at maximum efficiency and randomly placed it would be 343 at randomly designed. Is my math right and is there a better formula for this. My calc teacher couldn't direct me to a formula and I already asked them.

Tl;dr: How many balls can I fit into a cube that is 40x36x24 inches. And what is the math and how do I solve this. I found 74% max efficiency and 65% random efficiency.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:33
Cothron Theiss's Avatar
Cothron Theiss Cothron Theiss is offline
Registered Muser
FRC #4462 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Kingston, Tennessee
Posts: 588
Cothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Balls in a Cube

As thorough as your math might be, I'd say your best bet is to get cardboard boxes of different sizes and see how much fuel can fit inside. Also, I kinda doubt anyone will ever have a reasonable need for >300 pieces of Fuel at one time.
__________________
"It's taking longer than expected, which was to be expected."
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:38
sqwash984 sqwash984 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josef Griesmer
FRC #5431 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Plano
Posts: 7
sqwash984 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Balls in a Cube

The reason I have a large volume is just for examples sake. I'm just wondering if my math is correct and what is the proper way to do it. While I realize creating a regression equation empirically is just as good, I would like to learn the math so I can apply it to other things than just this game.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:43
Jamesa47 Jamesa47 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4761 (Robockets)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
Jamesa47 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Balls in a Cube

I was doing the exact same math as you a few minutes ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_close_pack

This is the article I used to find out a packing density that would be reasonable for spheres in a container. (Judging by your 74% figure, you probably used the same one. Oh well, here it is for everyone else.)

I was assuming that they were being poured in from either a hopper or a loading station and used the low end of efficiency for poured random packing, which is 60.9%. The volume of one ball is 65.54 in^3, that divided by 0.609 is effectively ~107 in^3 per ball. The rest of the math should be fairly straightforward, and I got ~320 balls in your 40x36x24 container.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:47
Jamesa47 Jamesa47 is offline
Registered User
FRC #4761 (Robockets)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
Jamesa47 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Balls in a Cube

I forgot to add to my previous reply, the actual number of balls contained will most likely be a little less than that because not all the dimensions are divisible by 5 (the diameter of the ball), so you'll have some extra space not being occupied by a ball necessarily.a
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 19:51
iambujo iambujo is offline
Mentor
FRC #2729 (Storm)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 86
iambujo is a name known to alliambujo is a name known to alliambujo is a name known to alliambujo is a name known to alliambujo is a name known to alliambujo is a name known to all
Re: Balls in a Cube

Josef - one thing to note is that I don't think the volume is really 36x40x24 (see R03). Those dimensions include bumpers, so you are limited to something closer to 30x34x24 for the actual robot, with the 24 being the max allowable height. Just want to make sure you followed R03 properly.

I believe that would leave you with max 24,480 cubic inches of storage.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 20:02
Hitchhiker 42's Avatar
Hitchhiker 42 Hitchhiker 42 is offline
Roboter
AKA: Mark Lavrentyev
FRC #4557 (FullMetal Falcons)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Cromwell, CT
Posts: 524
Hitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond reputeHitchhiker 42 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Balls in a Cube

Quote:
Originally Posted by iambujo View Post
Josef - one thing to note is that I don't think the volume is really 36x40x24 (see R03). Those dimensions include bumpers, so you are limited to something closer to 30x34x24 for the actual robot, with the 24 being the max allowable height. Just want to make sure you followed R03 properly.

I believe that would leave you with max 24,480 cubic inches of storage.
To be fair, the calculation also assumes that your entire robot is just fuel.
__________________



2016 - NE District Championship Entrepreneurship Award
2016 - Hartford District Industrial Design Award
2016 - Waterbury District Engineering Inspiration Award
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 20:07
2544HCRC's Avatar
2544HCRC 2544HCRC is offline
Registered User
FRC #2544 (HCRC)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Harborcreek, PA
Posts: 56
2544HCRC has a spectacular aura about2544HCRC has a spectacular aura about2544HCRC has a spectacular aura about
Re: Balls in a Cube

Yes you are pretty close. This is a common problem for calculating the capacity of petroleum reservoirs. A rough guess for any volume, no matter the size of the spheres (as long as they are uniform) is about 30% porosity.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 20:12
Eric Scheuing's Avatar
Eric Scheuing Eric Scheuing is offline
Registered User
FRC #0999 (MechaRAMS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 415
Eric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud of
Re: Balls in a Cube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitchhiker 42 View Post
To be fair, the calculation also assumes that your entire robot is just fuel.
Yours won't be?
__________________




2005-2007: Bobcat Robotics 177
2015-20XX: MechaRAMS 999
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 20:14
faraz5557's Avatar
faraz5557 faraz5557 is offline
BB-R8ER
AKA: Faraz Masroor
FRC #5557 (BB R8ERS)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Miami, FL.
Posts: 18
faraz5557 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Balls in a Cube

If you really wanted to you could have some fuel balls stick out of the robot boundaries (like stacked up above the boundary) but this would likely be bad design as you'd have to stop slowly.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 21:02
fargus111111111's Avatar
fargus111111111 fargus111111111 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tim W
FRC #0343 (Metal in Motion)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 102
fargus111111111 is on a distinguished road
Re: Balls in a Cube

Quote:
Originally Posted by iambujo View Post
Josef - one thing to note is that I don't think the volume is really 36x40x24 (see R03). Those dimensions include bumpers, so you are limited to something closer to 30x34x24 for the actual robot, with the 24 being the max allowable height. Just want to make sure you followed R03 properly.

I believe that would leave you with max 24,480 cubic inches of storage.
While this is still assuming that they entire robot is just fuel, there is nothing in the rules that says that you have to remain inside the frame perimeter, so theoretically you could have a robot that extends completely to the maximum dimensions by hanging over the bumpers. Note: you do have to start inside the frame perimeter, but do not have to stay within it.
__________________
I didn't break it... this time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi