Go to Post Not that I'm doubting you, but where is it bugged? The exterminators are in the house. - Greg McKaskle [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Are you planning on building a tall or wide robot?
Tall 55 28.50%
Wide 138 71.50%
Voters: 193. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 19:37
Flashback0902 Flashback0902 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan Lance
FRC #5550 (Broncho Bots)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Bethany, Oklahoma
Posts: 8
Flashback0902 is an unknown quantity at this point
Wide vs. Tall

I would like to know what size robot you are planning to build.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 19:40
Poseidon5817's Avatar
Poseidon5817 Poseidon5817 is offline
Founder and CEO, DeadMemes Studios
AKA: Mitchel Stokes
FRC #5817 (Uni-Rex)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 398
Poseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud of
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flashback0902 View Post
I would like to know what size robot you are planning to build.
Speaking from a design standpoint, I feel like a large amount of teams will choose the 24" version, because with the inclusion of bumpers in the size limit now, the 36" robot may just be too small for some teams to go with.

That being said, we decided to go with the 36" robot, because it will help us accomplish our goals of being an insanely fast gear moving bot, and since we aren't climbing, everything works out great.
__________________
My FRC History:

2014 - Team 1671: Central Valley Regional Finalist and Chairman's Award Winner, Sacramento Regional Finalist, Archimedes Quarterfinalist
2015 - Team 1671: Central Valley Regional Semifinalist, Sacramento Regional Semifinalist and Chairman's Award Winner, Newton Winner, Einstein Winner
2016 - Team 5817: Central Valley Regional Finalist and Rookie All-Star, Orange County Regional Quarterfinalist and Rookie All-Star, Newton Division
2017 - Team 5817: Return of the bench grinder


Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 20:43
engunneer's Avatar
engunneer engunneer is offline
Alumni turned Mentor
AKA: Branden Gunn
FRC #4761
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 864
engunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

There should be 6 poll options

What volume /driving direction
Tall and narrow
Tall and wide
Tall and multidirectional
Short and narrow
Short and wide
Short and multidirectional

I'm personally leaning short and wide but I'm not with my team today to gauge their leanings
__________________
Student FRC23 (1996-1999), Mentor FRC246 (2000), Mentor FRC1318 (2007-2009), Mentor FRC93 (2011), Mentor FRC2151 (2012), Mentor FRC23 (2013), Mentor FRC4761 (2014-2017)
1998 - National Chairman's Award and Woodie Flowers Award (FRC23, Mike Bastoni ) | 2007 - PNW SF (488, 1595) | 2008 - Oregon RCA - Seattle #2 Seed, SF (488, 1696) | 2009 - Oregon #1 Seed, Winners (1983, 2635) - Seattle SF (945, 2865) - Galileo #2 Seed, SF (973, 25) | 2012 Midwest F (111, 71) | 2014 RIDE Winners (78, 125), Inspector - NEU #24, QF (3479, 3958) - NECMP #35 | 2015 Reading #11, SF (1058, 190), Inspector - RIDE #17, QF(4055, 5494), Inspector - NECMP #57 | 2016 Reading #4, SF (133, 4474), DCA, Inspector - Ride #22, SF (1735, 2067), Creativity, Inspector - NECMP #48, RCA - Archimedes
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:01
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,015
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

we are almost starting to figure out what our robot might want to do...still haven't drawn a picture of it, let alone started on dimensions. So, maybe we'll know by the end of the week?
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:19
Bryce2471's Avatar
Bryce2471 Bryce2471 is offline
Alumnus
AKA: Bryce Croucher
FRC #2471 (Team Mean Machine)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 424
Bryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud of
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poseidon5817 View Post
Speaking from a design standpoint, I feel like a large amount of teams will choose the 24" version, because with the inclusion of bumpers in the size limit now, the 36" robot may just be too small for some teams to go with.

That being said, we decided to go with the 36" robot, because it will help us accomplish our goals of being an insanely fast gear moving bot, and since we aren't climbing, everything works out great.
I'm very curious how being 36" tall will help you put gears on faster...
__________________
FLL Team Future imagineers
2010 Oregon State Championships: Winners
2011 International Invite: First place Robot design, Second Place Robot Performance
FRC Team Mean Machine
2012 Seattle: Winning alliance
2013 Portland: Winning alliance
2013 Spokane: Winning alliance
2014 Wilsonville: Winning alliance
2014 Worlds: Deans List Winner
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:38
Poseidon5817's Avatar
Poseidon5817 Poseidon5817 is offline
Founder and CEO, DeadMemes Studios
AKA: Mitchel Stokes
FRC #5817 (Uni-Rex)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 398
Poseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud ofPoseidon5817 has much to be proud of
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce2471 View Post
I'm very curious how being 36" tall will help you put gears on faster...
It lets us power our robot using the momentum from five onboard bench grinders that we are reusing from last season's reveal.
__________________
My FRC History:

2014 - Team 1671: Central Valley Regional Finalist and Chairman's Award Winner, Sacramento Regional Finalist, Archimedes Quarterfinalist
2015 - Team 1671: Central Valley Regional Semifinalist, Sacramento Regional Semifinalist and Chairman's Award Winner, Newton Winner, Einstein Winner
2016 - Team 5817: Central Valley Regional Finalist and Rookie All-Star, Orange County Regional Quarterfinalist and Rookie All-Star, Newton Division
2017 - Team 5817: Return of the bench grinder


Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:46
frcguy's Avatar
frcguy frcguy is offline
#GearsAllDay
AKA: Nicholas Dal Porto
FRC #5940 (B.R.E.A.D.)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Burlingame, CA
Posts: 890
frcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poseidon5817 View Post
It lets us power our robot using the momentum from five onboard bench grinders that we are reusing from last season's reveal.
Better make sure they're all powered by legal motors.
__________________


2017: Team 5940 (Silicon Valley Regional/San Francisco Regional)
2016: Team 5940 (Silicon Valley Regional Rookie All-Star and Quarterfinalist, Curie Quarterfinalist)

Volunteer: 2016 (Chezy Champs Field Reset, Capital City Classic FTA, MadTown ThrowDown FTA)
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:48
cadandcookies's Avatar
cadandcookies cadandcookies is offline
Director of Programs, GOFIRST
AKA: Nick Aarestad
FTC #9205 (The Iron Maidens)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 1,552
cadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond reputecadandcookies has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by frcguy View Post
Better make sure they're all powered by legal motors.
No, I want to see them show up at a regional with a completely bench-grinder powered robot just for the inspectors' reactions.
__________________

Never assume the motives of others are, to them, less noble than yours are to you. - John Perry Barlow
tumblr | twitter
'Snow Problem CAD Files: 2015 2016
MN FTC Field Manager, FTA, CSA, Emcee
FLL Maybe NXT Year (09-10) -> FRC 2220 (11-14) -> FTC 9205(14-?)/FRC 2667 (15-16)
VEXU UMN (2015-??)
Volunteer since 2011
2013 RCA Winner (North Star Regional) (2220)
2016 Connect Award Winner (North Super Regional and World Championship) (9205)
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 21:49
frcguy's Avatar
frcguy frcguy is offline
#GearsAllDay
AKA: Nicholas Dal Porto
FRC #5940 (B.R.E.A.D.)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Burlingame, CA
Posts: 890
frcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadandcookies View Post
No, I want to see them show up at a regional with a completely bench-grinder powered robot just for the inspectors' reactions.
Knowing Mitch they actually would.
__________________


2017: Team 5940 (Silicon Valley Regional/San Francisco Regional)
2016: Team 5940 (Silicon Valley Regional Rookie All-Star and Quarterfinalist, Curie Quarterfinalist)

Volunteer: 2016 (Chezy Champs Field Reset, Capital City Classic FTA, MadTown ThrowDown FTA)
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 22:22
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poseidon5817 View Post
It lets us power our robot using the momentum from five onboard bench grinders that we are reusing from last season's reveal.
New off-season project.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 22:27
Dan Waxman Dan Waxman is offline
Registered User
FRC #0263 (Aftershock)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Long Island
Posts: 35
Dan Waxman is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wide vs. Tall

As of right now, we've decided on the 36" tall, but that's subject to change. We think it will be easier to package a nice shooter that's harder to block in those dimensions, and a climb might be easier to execute since you have to traverse one foot less. That's all subject to change though, depending on what the conscientious is after prototyping.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 22:55
Donut Donut is offline
The Arizona Mentor
AKA: Andrew
FRC #2662 (RoboKrew)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,302
Donut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond reputeDonut has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide vs. Tall

I appreciate that the GDC made sure both robot size constraints have identical volumes. No storing extra balls in one config versus the other.

The early ideas were that we will likely not climb, which makes a short and wide robot most likely.
__________________
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Student: 2004 - 2007
FRC Team 498 (Peoria, AZ), Mentor: 2008 - 2011
FRC Team 167 (Iowa City, IA), Mentor: 2012 - 2014
FRC Team 2662 (Tolleson, AZ), Mentor: 2014 - Present
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 22:58
Munchskull's Avatar
Munchskull Munchskull is offline
CAD Designer/ Electrical Consaltant
AKA: Anthony Cardinali
FRC #0997 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 526
Munchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to behold
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donut View Post
I appreciate that the GDC made sure both robot size constraints have identical volumes. No storing extra balls in one config versus the other.

The early ideas were that we will likely not climb, which makes a short and wide robot most likely.
That said the tall one has a smaller volume in the frame perimeter.
__________________
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.” ― Anonymous
Anthony Cardinali
4th year of FRC
Class of 2017



Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 23:05
Robo Hamsters Robo Hamsters is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matthew Vesperman
FRC #4466 (Robo Hamsters)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Culpeper, Va.
Posts: 87
Robo Hamsters is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Most likely tall and narrow.
__________________

FRC 4466
FTC 7042
=================
2013 Washington DC Regional Finalist
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2017, 12:17
ldsedam's Avatar
ldsedam ldsedam is offline
Registered User
AKA: Drew Sedam
FRC #2137 (TORC)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 22
ldsedam is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Wide vs. Tall

I feel like it is easier to make a bot that can hold more fuel with the tall bot. However, it's completely possible to make a bot that holds 20+ fuel with the wide one and its safer to make a short wide bot with a large wheel base if you're planning on racing around the field. A tall bot that is trying to be fast and race across the field is going to have a hard time not flipping.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:49.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi