|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Caleb this paper provided an unexpected result. The range of predictive accuracy in 2016 of the 10 methods is from ~66% to ~75%. However the combination of predictors made a slight improvement of ~1% to ~76%. One would expect a combination of predictors to improve more than ~1%
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|