|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fueling Scoring Challenge
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fueling Scoring Challenge
I have concerns for Auto. If each boiler can average 5bps, If red and blue both shoot the same amount of balls in auto at the same time (everything equal except the boilers) if red boiler processes 4bps and blue (by lucky ball bounces in the boiler innards) hits 6, these boilers could be the ones determining the winners since balls still processing after auto ends are only worth 1/3 as much. Unlike can grabbing where everyone could see, boiler insides and counting is hidden from spectators. That could be frustrating seeing both teams put up the same amount of shots and seeing a 30 point difference
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Fueling Scoring Challenge
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fueling Scoring Challenge
It's a fair point though. A 1 bps difference between boilers over the course of a 150 second match means 150 balls could fail to be accounted for.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fueling Scoring Challenge
Quote:
It's a single robot. 3 robots at 4 per second is something my VEX teams can do. Be better. It's a US check in USD, your bank can do the exchange. I'll mail it to you. Would love to pay you in TIM$, there is not Tim Hortan's here. Which is a good thing because then I'd weigh 283kg. (Yes, did the conversion, that's how much I love Tims) Quote:
(Side note: Since you said multi-shooters my brain is going "24 at a time? really?" So the deal is 96 in 8 seconds for the $100. Do it in far less time, your check *may* be bigger, my discretion ) Foster Nack predicts that I'll write one check. But Foster Nack predicts that STEMRobotics will be happy to write 3675 checks. Last edited by Foster : 13-01-2017 at 16:19. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|