|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Quote:
This means you can fire it with a pulse of power, and it will retain positions through power on and off, and even air supply on and off (There's grease on the spool which is sticky, and little indents that help hold the shifted spool in place). The one thing I'd advise against doing is leaving both inputs fired. This may cause them to slide or move. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Quote:
The valve has a couple of traits. It can be single or double acting (or more), it can have one output or two (Or more), and the internal spool (Slidy bit that does the air shifting) can have two positions or more. You can have any combination of these traits. The cylinder itself has a different set of traits. It can be double acting (You need air to move it out, and back) or single acting (You need air to move it out, but it springs back), or even reverse single acting (It extends via spring, but retracts with air pressure). You may have one, and only one of these traits. (Well, there are 3 position cylinders, but we're not talking about them) When a valve is single acting, it has one little coil that's energized by an outside voltage. That shifts the spool inside, and sends air to a different output. When the voltage goes away, the spring returns the spool to the default position, and redirects the air. When it's double acting, it has two little coils. Applying a burst of power to one shifts the spool in one direction and it will stay there until a burst is applied to the other side, which will shift it the other way. A single-acting valve is used where you want a item to have a default position, like an arm that must be retracted at the start and end of a match when your robot has no power. The spring will move the spool in the valve to the default position, and route air to the retract of the cylinder, so when you lose power, it will retract the arm. A double acting valve is used when you want to keep the position of an item after a power loss. Once the burst of power has been applied, the spool stays in place until a burst moves it the other way. EITHER ONE OF THESE VALVES CAN BE USED WITH ANY TYPE OF CYLINDER If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them for you. If you'd rather keep them private, feel free to send me a PM. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
As someone that has experience working with multiple pneumatic systems on past robots, I cannot emphasize enough the importance in taking the time to build a good system. Simplify it as much as possible, more connections increase the possible points of failure. Soapy water is good for finding leaks, but sometimes it's faster to just redo suspect connections. Good luck and don't take shortcuts!
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Mount the following where the Robot Inspector can easily see (read) them:
1) High Pressure Guage 2) Low Pressure Gauges 3) Switch (RI will need to short it out) Mount the dump valve where it can be easily and safely reached, and protect it from accidental bumping. Follow the diagram in the manual so you have all the pieces in the right places. Adjust your high pressure relief valve to the proper specs. ONE AND ONLY ONE Compressor. Backup Compressor allowed in the Pit, but not connected to anything. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Be prepared to teach the robot inspector about pneumatic systems. At least three times in my FRC career I've had to coach an inspector through our air system, how it worked, and which rules it obeyed.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Honestly, I'm not surprised at this. Since the pneumatics rules were opened up, they have been relatively lax. Instead of listing the allowed motors by part number and specifically detailing how they need to be wired, the rules allow you to use an unlimited variety of pneumatic components provided that they are rated to a high enough pressure and allows them to be connected in almost any configuration, save for a few specifications. That means every team will have different components connected in a different way threaded throughout their robot. Expecting inspectors to know the pressure ratings for every pneumatic part and being able to instantly identify how they are connected on your robot does not make sense. You know your robot a lot better than the inspectors. You need to prove to them that your robot is safe, not the other way around.
|
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: (New)matics advice
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|