Go to Post If the pattern holds, it's a bizarro year. - GeeTwo [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 14:31
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,745
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

As GeeTwo said, you should be able to calculate your air usage. If you're only using it for shifting, you can probably get by with one or two 36 cu in tanks. A single tank would get you 160 actuations of a 3/4" x 1/2" cylinder at 60 psi. So 40 low-high-low shifts for a double acting cylinder. 80 for the Andymark spring return cylinder. Shifting from low to high and back every 3 seconds seems reasonable, unless you have really aggressive auto shifting. If you can drop the working pressure to 40 psi without shifting too slowly, you can double the amount of actuations. 50 psi = 40% more shifts.

An onboard compressor isn't really going to save you much space, because it's big and you'd still need some sort of storage tank. A 36 cu in tank is 12 x 2.7, 88 cu in if you call it a box. The compressor is 2.1 x 4.5 x 6, 57 cu in as a box. So it's pretty close on volume consumption. You'd probably be better off running 2 tanks and no compressor than 1 tank and 1 compressor. You'd definitely be better off running just 1 tank.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 14:49
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,033
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

be sure to figure in the little bit of extra effort required to make sure the tank is full before each match. And the fun of having a small leak that drains the storage tank during a match, but if you had a compressor on board, it would not be a problem. We had offboard compressor our rookie year (mainly because no one was keeping track of weight and the robot was way over weight), but on board ever since. I'm a fan of KISS and that means making it easy for the drive team, by not making them do any extra work.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 15:09
RichQuinn's Avatar
RichQuinn RichQuinn is offline
Registered User
FRC #5053 (Lakers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 9
RichQuinn is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

For Stronghold last year, we ran a small pneumatic kicker for the shooter and were able to run an entire match on a single tank. We chose to keep the compressor off-board to avoid the weight penalty.

Carrying an off-board compressor means always having to keep an external system on hand and nearby before every practice match, competition match, sponsor demo, etc. It is an inspected device at competition and requires duplicating the relief valve, gauges, pressure switch, battery, etc. Since humans will continue to be humans, there will be cases where the system fails to get charged before an event and you will ask yourself if those 2.4 pounds were worth it. For us, they were not.

Put me in the On Board camp from now on.
__________________
5053 Laker Robotics
Waterford, Michigan
www.lakerrobotics.com
See our 2016 Stronghold Season Review here: https://youtu.be/pGXwZFJIJzk

Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 15:27
theun4gven theun4gven is offline
What time is it?
AKA: Tom Filipek
FRC #0079 (Team Krunch)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 24
theun4gven is just really nicetheun4gven is just really nicetheun4gven is just really nicetheun4gven is just really nicetheun4gven is just really nice
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrForbes View Post
be sure to figure in the little bit of extra effort required to make sure the tank is full before each match. And the fun of having a small leak that drains the storage tank during a match, but if you had a compressor on board, it would not be a problem. We had offboard compressor our rookie year (mainly because no one was keeping track of weight and the robot was way over weight), but on board ever since. I'm a fan of KISS and that means making it easy for the drive team, by not making them do any extra work.
I can't reiterate this enough. If you are running an offboard compressor you'd best be sure you've removed your leaks. First few matches of the day and they want your robot on the field or queued up before opening cermeonies? Someone having field connection issues or the field sits with your robot for 30+ minutes? Made it to Einstein and your robot is put on the field ready to play and you only have to wait for a small speech by Dean before you get going? That small leak adds up.

The Viair compressors are small and weigh around 2.4 lbs. At that size I'll take the peace of mind and removal of another step from the drive team's checklist over the weight savings.
__________________
Team 79 - Krunch
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 15:43
rich2202 rich2202 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2202 (BEAST Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,275
rich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

IMHO, weight won't be a problem this year. Space will be at a premium. I would go with a compressor and a small storage cylinder.

In your code, you can deactivate the compressor when power to the CIM's is more than 75% (or whatever number you want).
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 15:12
GeeTwo's Avatar
GeeTwo GeeTwo is online now
Technical Director
AKA: Gus Michel II
FRC #3946 (Tiger Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 3,725
GeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond reputeGeeTwo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On board compressor vs Stored air

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
An onboard compressor isn't really going to save you much space, because it's big and you'd still need some sort of storage tank. A 36 cu in tank is 12 x 2.7, 88 cu in if you call it a box. The compressor is 2.1 x 4.5 x 6, 57 cu in as a box. So it's pretty close on volume consumption. You'd probably be better off running 2 tanks and no compressor than 1 tank and 1 compressor. You'd definitely be better off running just 1 tank.
If you're more limited by volume than weight and doing such small shifts, you can do a compressor and a much smaller (metal) accumulator; I'd recommend something at least 3x as large as the combined volume of your shifter cylinders. You can get these from Bimba or other sources. As a temporary solution (but as I read the rules not at competition) you can use the rod (retract) side of a medium-sized cylinder as an accumulator. There are probably also smaller plastic accumulators out there, but I haven't searched.
__________________

If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.

Last edited by GeeTwo : 23-01-2017 at 15:33. Reason: added link
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi